Powered by Bravenet Bravenet Blog

Thursday, July 2nd 2009

1:08 AM (1 day, 14h, 13min ago)

H3N8 Fatal Canine Flu 'ALERT' for All Dog Owners in All States

  • Mood: Canine Flu Alert - 2009
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©
H3N8 Fatal Canine Flu 'ALERT' for All Dog Owners in All States
Dogs have no natural immunity to the virus, virtually every animal exposed will be infected.

United States, July 2, 2009 (NationalDogPress.com) --

This is a reemerging pathogen in 2009 of a potentially dangerous canine flu called H3N8, and there is very little information to make predictions about it's potential spread through the USA at this time. And it appears that the fatality rate is between 1 and 10 percent.

This deadly H3N8 canine flu has been making family domestic dogs and also racing greyhounds ill in the USA. It is known by experts to have jumped from horses in a “very rare event,” say scientists.

Dogs have no natural immunity to the virus, and virtually every animal exposed will be infected. About 80 percent of dogs that are infected with the virus will develop some symptoms, the symptoms are often mistaken for “kennel cough,” a common canine illness that is caused by the bordetella bronchiseptica bacteria.

Both diseases can cause coughing and gagging for up to three weeks, but dogs with canine flu may have fevers as high as 106 degrees and runny noses. A few will develop pneumonia, which is sometimes fatal. Antibiotics and fluid cut the pneumonia fatality rate. The virus is an H3N8 flu closely related to an equine flu strain. It is not related to a typical human flu or to the H5N1 avian flu.

Experts said there are no known cases of the canine flu infecting humans. The risk of that is low. Local veterinary health experts agree.

Still, the reaction for canine's getting this flu can be acute.

But with the human flu season and fears about the recent pandemic human flu scares in the media there is much confusion among some dog-owners who have heard of this canine flu disease.

Just because there is currently a lack of the H3N8 canine flu cases in your city, county and state areas, is no reason for dog people to overreact, or under react to visible symptoms of a dog coughing. It also means dog owners and vets should be aware its out there in the USA, and could strike any area of the USA at any time in the near future.

 · Return to Website ·

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

 
by Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com

Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
 National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.
 

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
 The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2009,
  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved
View Entry

Monday, June 29th 2009

12:26 AM (4 days, 14h, 54min ago)

'ALERT' for Mills County, Iowa Animal Owners

  • Mood: This appears to be proposed "under the table" from the county citizen public's view.
 

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

'ALERT' for Mills County, Iowa Animal Owners

Newly Proposed Animal Care and Control Ordinance for Mills County, Iowa

MILLS COUNTY, Iowa, June 28 (NationalDogPress.com) --

On 28 June 09, this Lead Investigative Reporter was personally contacted by an individual who requested anonymity and advised the following about animal control in Mills County, Iowa:

 

On this same date, a neighbor was visited by an officer with the Mills County Sheriff Department regarding a complaint of a dog at large chasing a horse. Upon contact with the neighbor the deputy (not named) allegedly informed the neighbor that any dog running loose off the property had better be licensed per a new animal ordinance in Mills County or the Deputy could issue a citation for dogs at large and confiscate them, sending them to the "ARF" animal rescue shelter. The Deputy allegedly continued stating, “a dog license would have to be purchased from the ‘ARF’ animal shelter”.

 

The person requesting anonymity advised this Investigator they were unaware of any such ordinance or of any animal shelter in Mills County, and this was the first they had heard of it from the neighbor or Deputy Sheriff. This Investigator was asked to investigate whether Mills County, Iowa in deed has this type of ordinance or animal shelter in force now.

 

Upon receiving this information, this Investigative Reporter conducted an inquiry into the validity of this ordinance complaint and the following information was disclosed. A review of the following official Mills County, Iowa web site http://www.millscoia.us/announcements.htm does in fact identify a newly proposed animal care and control ordinance dated from 2008 in PDF format.

 

The last update to the proposed animal control ordinance appears to be 2 June 2008 and it appears to be unsigned or approved in the PDF document. However, the proposal notification on the Mills County, Iowa web site dated 28 June 2009, reflects this animal control proposal is renewed and is now a current animal care and control county ordinance proposal. 

 

You can read the entire animal care and control proposal of 16 pages for Mills County, Iowa at the following link:

 

http://www.millscoia.us/publicnotices_announcements/Ordinance08-03_AnimalCareandControl.pdf

 

The complainant who spoke to this Investigative Reporter stated the following about this new animal control information 'coming to light' in Mills County, Iowa:

 

"It could happen any time," they said. "I'll just be surprised if it doesn't."

 

Further Investigative inquiries are being conducted to obtain more up to date information on the status of this proposed animal care and control ordinance posted on Mills County, Iowa web site as of 28 June 09.

Stay tuned. This appears to be proposed "under the table" from the county citizen public's view.

 · Return to Website ·

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

 
by Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com
Email: Dogpressorg@aol.com

Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
 National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, and DogPress.org news press services.
 

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
 The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2009,
  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved
View Entry

Friday, June 26th 2009

12:47 AM (7 days, 14h, 34min ago)

An Open Letter to President Obama and the U.S. Congress

  • Mood: DIRTY DIRT WON’T WASH IN THE NEW SOCIALIST AMERICA NOW IN TOTAL ECONOMIC FAILURE.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

An Open Letter to President Obama and the U.S. Congress


An Open Letter to President Obama and the U.S. Congress

 

25 June 09

 

 

CLEAN DIRT WILL WASH OFF – DIRTY DIRT WON’T WASH IN THE NEW SOCIALIST AMERICA NOW IN TOTAL ECONOMIC FAILURE

Dear President Obama, and the U.S. Congress,

 

This country was built by honorable people who got dirty, but in a clean way. Dirty old men with calloused hands and dingy overalls and women with food stains and baby spit-up on them were responsible for this nation's Golden Age.

 

This nation is no longer remaining the “land of the free, home of the brave” but this mother land is now destined to be the new Socialist America by all the liberal starch-collared, manicured Socialist and Marxist influenced presidents, political czars, congressional members, financial law makers, bankers, car makers, commodities traders, and especially the animal rights activist lobbyists, liberal animal control activist mayors, and animal rights activist groups "perverting" the natural God given ‘green’ laws of constitution and private property ownership.

 

While these dirty dirt Socialists sit at a computer all day and steel our nation’s wealth by increasing “cap and trade” devastating regulations to break our national electrical industries, free trade ordinances, environmental laws, and animal control; regulations about our pets, dogs, cats, horses, cattle, sheep, goats, beans, gold, oil, timber and other things, these "PERVERTED" law  makers and animal rights groups have no idea how to even produce an ounce of freedom or wealth for this nation and people.

 

Yet “We the People” of America (the free and the brave) use clean dirt in our daily lives to produce animals or produce on farms or in loving pet owner homes, in a traditional and natural God given “green” manner, independent of government intrusion or violation of the U.S. Constitution by tyranny.

 

The best people I've ever known had hands that looked like well-worn leather with cracks and crevices that crisscrossed their palms with tributaries of topsoil with a bunch of loving pet dogs running beside them thru the fields and in their homes, and towns where they live and own their private property without government handouts or welfare. They are traditional pet owners, farmers and producers, pet lovers and animal breeders, family people, who work all day in the fields or at their jobs and get so dirty when they come home at night they have to undress outside because they have a quarter-acre of soil in their boots.

These conservative Americans may be what some might call dirty. But it's a clean kind of dirt, acquired in honest work. I guarantee once they get hosed off with soap and water they are cleaner beneath their rough veneer than the bungling Socialists controlling America, Congress, manufacturing and industry owned now by the government, the USDA, PETA, Animal Rights Groups, Animal Humane Society (HSUS), or City, State, and Federal Congressional bureaucrats and paper-pushers who waste away in offices all day with hardly a need to wash their hands.

 

These Socialist and Marxist liberal people and politicians are too good to get their hands dirty with the truth of the Nation being destroyed, or even a simple pet dog at their side at home or in the field, called pets and working animals protecting their owners, not just lying unattended for show in an office chair somewhere for show.

 

Where's the evidence the Socialist and Marxist economic paper law pushers or even the animal rights perverts pushing Socialism in animal ownership did anything that day worth bragging about, except to destroy this Nation's military, economic, industrial, and food security.

 

At the heart of the whole scenario is the simple God given right of pet ownership in a loving family unit, and American's civil rights and freedoms to be free from government intrusion and violation to freely raise their "OWN" pets and animals on their "OWN" property without tyranny from the many proposals or federal, state, county, and city pet ordinances, let alone the freedom to earn and spend our own hard earned money from working in clean dirt in this nation’s affairs.


Now We the People only have a Socialist proposal not even completed or enacted, yet thousands are being spent in 50 states to implement this perverted Socialist ways of thinking in economic and control laws, ordinances and “green” programs of "Stamping Out" our incomes, lives, and even our pets and animals, at the choosing of the Socialists.

 

These Socialists have started to destroy America by instituting regulations like the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) in the USDA with "animal death squads" or Metro Animal Shelter Storm Troopers, or animal activist citizens stealing pets from private property by perverted “Samaritan Laws,” to allegedly stop disease or save some Socialist agenda, not really true, accurate, or substantiated.

 

The Socialists of this new America killing this nation like the euthanizing and killing of healthy pets and animals taken from a loving owners home, because they had a large number of healthy pets in the home, and openly burning or disposing of euthanized and dead pet carcasses is going to stop a disease or change people.

 

The name of this disease in America is the prions of Socialism, and it's the newly developed mad cow disease affecting our country and every citizen in this land.

 

This disease of Socialism can't be stopped or killed when it is allowed to burn and fester in the heat of ‘dirty dirt” politics and perverted Marxist economic policies and regulations like “cap and trade” of our nation’s coal fueling electrical plants of the USA.

 

The embers and smoke of these Socialist policies can still carry the disease of economic disaster into the air to spread to the next farm, home, or even state government. The Socialism of economic spending without controls is the same as the forced euthanasia of all owner’s pets stolen by perverted seizure of animal ordinances, and just lead to unjustified killing of healthy loved pets, for the sake of enforcing the “green” laws, without thought, proof, justification or merit of the SPIRIT of the law, only the letter defined by Socialists. We the People have become devalued in human form to just a pet of the Socialist dictators and their agendas of economic destruction of private property ownership.

 

President Obama, and the members of the United States Congress, I give you all a letter "F" and "S" for Failed Socialist’s thinking about the economic direction of this nation,  our freedom and security to survive with a constitution, and our safety even involving the simple family pet ownership of a dog, cat, or any other animal. Where has all that good ole fashion "common sense" in lawmaker's gone? To Hell I guess, in Socialism!

There is no good solution now for We the People, except to “resist” by any means possible to defend ourselves from all the perverted Socialist thinking and we must stand our ground to “take back our constitution and honorable laws”, to restore them to natural God given common sense laws.

 

Because killing healthy people in their hopes and dreams, killing our economic businesses, farms, and people’s jobs, and even their the killing of private ownership of our homes that contain our pet animals… killing them all like blood-sport, or a “green” scorched earth policy of a Nuke strike, is NOT a solution either.

 

You Socialists should think like conservative common sense folks with intelligent college educated people, mayors, councilmen/women, state governors, congressional members, and even animal Vets, to use their "Brains" and still save lives, not "destroy" them with like dirt.

The collective conscience of the Socialist Big Agri-Biz sheiks, monopoly Agro- CEO's and incarcerated agricultural energy traders, AR groupies, or legislators following perverted animal ownership thinking groups, wouldn't come clean with a box of Brillo pads and a high pressure hose. Your tractor mechanic or pet owner down at the small country garage fixing things, may be smeared with grease but at least his/her dirt will clean off with a little Lava and hand cleaner, and the dog playing in the mud will clean up too. Not so the dirty government agency Socialist dictator(s) making Anti-Pet ordinances, spay/neuter laws, who live like a pet-porn King in a mansion with fifteen bathrooms and a bidet, but not a dog in sight, in that house inside. He/she may not have dirt under his/her fingernails but he'll still be dirty when they step out of their gold encrusted shower.

The bloodstained independent farmer or local farm producer, iron-smudged welder, soot-covered fireman, saw-dusted carpenter, pet owner working on his/her home, repairing a dog house in the city, farmer's barn and coal-smeared miner digging coal(not "data-mining" the Internet and private information of the American Pet owners and animal owners), are all cleaner than the Socialist stylish and well coined Marxist businessmen who steals from his/her neighbor's pet dog, cat, or horse, or the shareholders and lays off the agri-biz farm workers just so he can get filthy rich on his/her stock options. That's filthy all right. And the smooth-skinned, payola packing, perfumed Congressional Federal, State, and city or town politicians, he/she has in his/her pocket of the Big 3 car makers, or many Agri-Biz and Animal Rights PERVERTED "profiteers" smells far worse than the tar splattered laborer, the septic tank pumper or the hog farmer, pet owner with 25 pets in their home on an independent traditional farm, kennel, or private property premises.

Like I said, there is clean dirt and there is dirty dirt. Soldiers do our dirty work in jungles and deserts all over the world. They may not shower daily, get pedicures or moisturize, but the dirt they wear is a badge of honor. I guarantee that even the most hygienically-challenged soldier is cleaner than the Socialists in government, or animal rights pushing Socialist politicians with blood-sport "profiteering lobbyist’s money on their hands.

 

Their hands can never come clean. So, to those Socialist and Marxist folks who look down their snooty noses at We the People who get dirty working for a living, I'd suggest that if they wanted to feel the cleanest they've ever been that they should go get dirty.

Get filthy farming or playing with your dog in a mud puddle; muddy up your life by producing something of value; work so hard that you smell; clean up someone's mess and in the process get dirty yourself.

I think you'll discover what the soiled among us have always allegedly known:


That dirt acquired in honest labor has the power to cleanse the soul and wash away Socialist blood-sport "profiteering" filth, beginning with the various animal rights activist groups, the National Animal Identification System (NAIS), and their Socialist "Oppressors" of freedom, liberty and the demise of the U.S. Constitution in the name of Socialism.

 

My definition of Socialism: The demise of a great nation called the United States of America beginning with anti-pet ownership of all citizens by Socialists who make “perverted” regulations, ordinances and laws as a result of one thing, Socialism.

 

In summary President Obama, and our U.S. Congress, note…

 

People in authority of 'perverted' agendas, are so 'addicted' to exaggeration in everything they do or say, that they cannot tell the truth without a lie.

I say: "We the People have the Right to Bear "FARMS." WITH PETS and ANIMALS!

Commentary "Open Letter" Article

 

by Dean A. Ayers

Glenwood, Iowa

 

 

Source: http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/

 

 

Dean A. Ayers, Director
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization

 

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
 National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©, DogPress.org, and Animalid.biz news press services.
 

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Legal Disclaimer:
 The information, articles, or links (posted, embedded or otherwise) to the above postings are provided to give readers more information on general dog-related or associated subjects and are not intended as legal advice. All individuals are urged to contact licensed attorneys in their states regarding specific legal issues.
 

Copyright © 2006-2009,
  Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization, All Rights Reserved

View Entry

Wednesday, June 17th 2009

1:01 AM (16 days, 14h, 20min ago)

HSUS, Animal Rights, and Animal Law School Joint Ventures

  • Mood: There is a big difference in the definition of the honorable "Animal Law" and the alleged 'tainted and perverted' agenda of HSUS and animal rights activist funded "Animal Rights Law."

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

HSUS, Animal Rights, and Animal Law School Joint Ventures




NationalDogPress.com Headline News © ALERT

HSUS, Animal Rights, and Animal Law School Joint Ventures

(MeatingPlace) -- 16 Jun 09 

A dog represented by an attorney in court may sound like a joke, but it’s not funny. It seems that animal rights law is rapidly growing in US law schools. According to the Lewis & Clark School of Law in Oregon,” animal law is a developing area of law encompassing any and all legal matters relating to animals, much in the same way that Environmental Law encompasses a broad range of issues.” Now, I’m not at all sure I know what that means, but I am sure that I need to learn more. 

George Washington University Law School and the Humane Society of the United States, HSUS, have a joint venture, the Animal Law Litigation Project, which is intended to "improve enforcement of animal protection laws." According to the Wall Street Journal, Bob Barker of The Price is Right Fame has donated millions to various law schools to establish animal law programs. Some of the schools benefiting from his generosity include Harvard, Columbia, Georgetown, Duke, Northwestern, Stanford and UCLA. 

I suspect that the upsurge in law schools offering course in this area is because there is a need for clarification of issues such as “cruelty”. Like pornography, the definition is obvious from more than one point of view. I wonder when the ACLU will get on this bandwagon. And, in case you think this is a fringe movement, prestigious schools like Harvard Law, Duke, University of Virginia and Stanford are offering courses.

Those of us in animal agriculture need to pay attention. The law should be above emotion, however, my fear is that like virtually everything else surrounding animal welfare, the law too will become tainted with emotion.

Remember, there is a big difference in the definition of the honorable "Animal Law" and the alleged 'tainted and perverted' agenda of HSUS and animal rights activist funded "Animal Rights Law" being pushed in these law schools. 

Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

View Entry

Saturday, June 6th 2009

4:06 AM (27 days, 11h, 15min ago)

American military to shoot "Any Dog" in a 100 yard radius of troops

  • Mood: Breaking News!

Saturday, June 6, 2009

American military to shoot "Any Dog" in a 100 yard radius of troops


NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

American military to shoot "Any Dog" in a 100 yard radius of troops



Nebraska - Iowa area, June 6 (NationalDogPress.com) –

 

A source of known reliability with "first hand" knowledge of this breaking news issue in the United States Army, who requested anonymity, advised this Investigative Reporter of the following: 

 

A military commander in authority has informed American troops of the immediate change in orders regarding military troop locations threatened by Al-Qaeda terrorists and insurgent fighters. The information is that Al-Qaeda terrorists and insurgent fighters are now placing or planting IED bombs to kill American troops on dogs.

 

An IED is defined as an "Improvised Explosive Device". Essentially a roadside bomb is mostly used by insurgents in Iraq.

 

ALLEGED NEW MILITARY ORDER GIVEN: The American military troops located in all terrorist threat areas where IED bombs are used (example Iraq and Afghanistan), are hereby ordered to "Shoot on Sight Any Dog" that comes into a 100 yard perimeter of any U.S. Military troop or individual. This order is issued as Al-Qaeda terrorists and insurgent fighters are now known to be planting IED bombs on dogs, in order to kill American troops.

 

As a result of this new order, there are going to be massive numbers of innocent dogs, being executed by American soldiers who have accidentally wandered into a 100 yard path of any American soldier. This investigative reporter opines this order will also prevent any American soldier from "being friends” with or assisting any dog in need, in overseas troop areas, ever again.

 

What a tragedy for both the American troops and all those innocent dogs that are going to be executed alike.

 

 · Return to Website ·

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

 
Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/


"United States Officially Certified Site"


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
 National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

View Entry

Thursday, June 4th 2009

3:30 AM (29 days, 11h, 50min ago)

The Licensing of Tyranny in Dog Ownership

  • Mood: http://animalsclubfreedom.blogspot.com/

Thursday, June 4, 2009

The Licensing of Tyranny in Dog Ownership


The Licensing of Tyranny in Dog Ownership

“The ideal animal control tyranny is that which is ignorantly self-administered by its victims.” ~ Dean A. Ayers


By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

4 Jun 09


The erosion of our freedom to own dogs, pets and animals, rings true of the current political climate in the USA today.  We the People who own dogs, cats, pets and animals are especially struck by the public’s statements concerning agreement or apathy towards all the various government licensing to include that of our pets and animals.

Definition of Licensing and the Misconceptions:

Most people seem to believe that a dog or pet license is a freedom, when in true fact, it is a taking.

A license is a temporary, revocable permit issued by government that allows the holder to have something or to do something that is otherwise illegal. For example, in the USAthe licensing of firearms has virtually removed our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Any time a license is issued, a freedom is jeopardized. By the very act of licensing dogs, the act of owning or even possessing a dog has been made illegal.

Animals are traditional property, now legally having “Intrinsic Value:”

Animals are human-kind's most ancient and traditional property. Before ever we settled down to a plot of land and threw seeds in the soil, we numbered animals as our most valuable possessions. Wealth has always been associated with the number of animals that a person owned, and kept.

Now animal ownership, use, and the ancient, honorable practice of animal husbandry are under global attack by dog laws, and animal ID laws globally. It was initiated by the animal "rights" movement, and adapted by local, state, and federal governments throughout the world.

A Dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds:

Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. "[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979).

Doing Away with Dog Ownership: 

All the dog legislation, animal control laws, dog ownership licensing, animal breeder licensing and animal ID programs will effectively do away with all but the largest commercial breeders and providers. When the small traditional owner and holder have been the basis for our  animals and economy world-wide, it soon will end with all animals owned being controlled through licensing of many types and behaviors, as well as the food we all eat for life will be controlled by the seed products being copyrighted thru large commercial concerns like Monsanto. For those of us who have traditionally grown our own food, raised animals or owned animals personally as pets or for various other reasons, we will be locked out of life by "licenses" of the various types of animals, premises, or property owners who will be locked up literally, also known as “Jail” or animal shelters, etc when they "fail" to maintain their license of same.

To Legislate Animals and Control or Not to Legislate, that is the Question:

Generally, people concerned about retaining their freedom and liberty in America are usually not in favor of "any" legislation of any kind that increases "stress" upon the freedom's of "We the People" no matter what the case or cause.

BUT..... after "reviewing" the "Who's Who" list of the “animal rights” organizations that are jumping up and down, screaming "unfair" I AM going to continue to explain and complain about this subject.  For one thing, ASPCA, HSUS, and PETA like groups, are the first "wasted" manipulators that will "AXE" your Freedoms to even merely "OWN" a pet. But wait, their perversion of animal law does not stop there. Consider the animal control laws backed by discovering the "INSANE" perverted dog "propaganda" information these people are allegedly spewing regarding alleged cruelty of animals by dog owners, for simply "keeping their pets" safe, in a "proper" kennel inside, or properly tethering their dogs outside their home, or the questionable manipulation on just being able to tie your dog or animal out to pee in the grass (for a little while) or even exercise your dog on a proper guide line", etc. The dog law perversion never stops.

Not to mention the lies that HSUS, the ASPCA, or PETA allegedly put out, in just about every category of dog ownership "reasonable care for animals and pets" to be lied about by HSUS and PETA and then manipulated by their licensing and legislation lies to allegedly make We the People the criminals, for simply "loving" our dogs, pets and animals in our own home.

In actuality, We the People ARE the "REALISTS" with "common sense" and "family values" that include our Legal and God Given "rights, per the Bill of Rights to be free from intrusion on our own private property with our dogs, pets and animals.  My family happens to be my "animals."

We the People are now headed immediately for a bleak (Pet-less - My Words) future that Dwight David Eisenhower warned the world about in his inaugural address, the "military, industrial complex".

"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane."  ~ Marcus Aurelius 

Dog Gone It, on a “Positive and Constructive” Note:

One reason a dog can be such a comfort such as when you're feeling blue or worried about tyranny legislation upon our animals, and ourselves, is that our dogs don't try to find out why. Some of these dog laws or animal control regulations appear to be "overwhelming" and appear "impossible to defeat."

Fortunately, I never have had enough intelligence to know, that I could not stop the impossible. I know "not" the meaning of defeat. This is the belief We as People, who own dogs, pets, and animals, need to retain, believe in, and “ACT” upon.

I Do Know This:

I DO KNOW, the Love of my dogs, and their “Intrinsic Value” to my life and theirs, there for, I shall not forsake them, even unto a bad law or "perverted" animal activist organization's efforts to defeat my love, admiration, and "Intrinsic value" in the ownership of my family of dogs and animals. With only ordinary talent and extraordinary perseverance, all things are attainable, even to defeat the impossible perversion of animal control laws facing us all nation wide. 

Dog and Pet Owners Remember This: 

Look at a stone cutter (loving dog owners) hammering away at his/her rock (tyranny & the animal control legislation oppressor), hitting the stone perhaps a hundred times without as much as a crack even showing in the rock (dog laws). Yet at the hundred-and-first blow the rock will split in two, and I know it was not the last blow that did it, but all that had gone before.

Let's get "busy" through "action" and “ACT” with authority of a dog owner, in charge of our freedom and liberty to crack this stone of tyranny upon our animals, and all the controlling tyranny of us all.  And that action with authority of preserving our freedom “includes” our family of dogs, pets, and animals. Period.

 

Article Source Link on “Intrinsic” Value of a Dog:

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Dog's+life+has+'intrinsic+value,'+New+York+judge+finds.-a018875469

 

###

 

About the Author - Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned AlamoState Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization 
and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

View Entry

Wednesday, May 27th 2009

11:13 PM (36 days, 16h, 7min ago)

Omaha, Nebraska Becoming the Dog Death Sentence Capital of the USA?

  • Mood: Omaha, Nebraska Dog Death Capital of the USA?

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Omaha, Nebraska Becoming the Dog Death Sentence Capital of the USA?




Omaha, Nebraska Becoming the Dog Death Sentence Capital of the USA?


27 May 09

- Commentary -

By Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

As an Investigative Reporter, I was contacted by a known person or reliable character, who owns dogs, as to the following information regarding Animal Control Enforcement in the Douglas County and Omaha. Ne. judicial court system...

1. A witness provided this reporter with a 'first hand' account of observing many animal control court cases recently in the Omaha, NE courts. An overview of the judgments were observed to be "Death" Sentences of immediate euthanasia of the dogs involved for various animal control offenses, on a regular and ongoing basis of decisions in the Douglas County, and Omaha, Ne court system.

2. Having spoken to people claiming to be working in the Nebraska Humae Society, they claim that essentially NO DOG is being 'put to sleep" (also called being "euthanized") by the Nebraska Humane Society, yet the 'cats' are being euthanized at a high rate.

3. In summary of the witness testimony received to date, the alleged employees of the Nebraska Humane Society would give the public the appearance of a 'no kill' type of dog environment in Omaha, NE., when in truth, the vast amount of judicial punishment for a vast majority of animal control offenses in Douglas County, NE, and Omaha, Ne is as follows:

Dog "EXECUTION" by euthanasia ordered to be carried out immediately by the Judge!

My question as a Lead Investigative Reporter in Omaha, Nebraska is as follows:

Why are the Judges in the Douglas County, Omaha, Nebraska court system violating the Constitutional Law upheld by the Supreme Court and other Dog Law Cases in unlawfully ordering the euthanasia of a dog without lawful 'DUE PROCESS' as follows?

My evidence to support my above question to the Omaha, Ne. judicial system is as follows:


1). Dog’s life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds.

Article Source Link:

http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Dog's+life+has+'intrinsic+value,'+New+York+judge+finds.-a018875469


Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. 

In 1989, Herbert Erwin took his five-year-old registered mastiff to the Animal Medical Center in the Bronx for treatment of an infected callus on the dog" leg. The veterinarian told Erwin the callus could be surgically removed or it could be treated by draining it. Erwin opted for the latter, explicitly rejecting surgical treatment, according to court documents. 

Erwin left his dog with the veterinarian for treatment. Instead of draining the sore, the veterinarian anesthetized the dog and surgically removed the callus. The dog died the next day due to complications from the anesthesia. 

The dog owner asked another veterinarian in the office to perform an autopsy, and he asked that the dog's body be retained so he could collect it. No autopsy was performed, however, and the body had been disposed of by the time Erwin came to pick it up. 

Erwin sued the veterinary practice for negligence, breach of warranty, and loss of companionship. He also sought emotional distress damages since the veterinarian failed to perform the autopsy and disposed of the body despite his wishes. (Erwin v. Animal Medical Center, No. 2603/95B (N.Y. Civ. Ct. Aug. 21, 1996).) 

Bronx County Civil Judge Karen Smith threw out all but the negligence claims. No trial date was set to resolve them. 

Smith ruled that New York's warranty statute applies to "goods," not rendered services and that loss of companionship and emotional distress damages cannot be claimed for the loss of personal property, which a dog is considered under New York law. 

On the negligence claims, the defendant argued that, if damages are awarded, they must be limited to the fair market value of the dog. The court disagreed, citing previous cases where a pet's "intrinsic value" may be considered. 

"[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). 

Smith, referring to still other cases, said a jury may also consider the dog's age, health, breed, training, usefulness, and any special traits of value, such as its guarding ability, when setting damages. "Depreciation," however, cannot be considered because "a good dog's value increases rather than fails with age and training," the court held. 


2). Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs

Friday, May 22, 2009

Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs

Article Link: http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/Animals_Club_Freedom/message/8617


Demand Due Process Before the Animal Control Authorities Can Remove or Euthanize Your Dogs by Tyranny.


Due Process should be provided to Dog Owners Before the Government can remove or Euthanize Their Dogs


How Does Due Process Apply to Dog Seizure/Euthanasia Cases?

Despite the fact that animals are still considered property in all legal jurisdictions today, due process, whether rooted in the federal or state constitutions, extends to life, liberty, or property. The more complicated issue, however, is how much process is due?

The Supreme Court has promulgated a four prong test to determine this. In each situation, a court must weigh

-the private interest affected by the official action

-the risk of an erroneous deprivation of that interest through the procedures used,

-the probable value of additional procedural safeguards, and

-the government interest involved.



Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).

Due process requires the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.

Rabon v. City of Seattle (Rabon II), 107 Wash.App. 734, 743 (2001) (citing Mathews, 424 U.S. at 333). Thus, when individuals can show they will suffer irreparable harm from a post-deprivation hearing, courts has recognized that a pre-deprivation hearing is necessary. In the case of orders to euthanize pets, many courts have considered the loss to the pet owner as irreparable.


Before the Hearing: Filing a Petition for a Preliminary Injunction

Dog owners should file a petition for an injunction to delay the killing of the dog until they have had the chance to be heard in court (For an actual example, see Petition for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction in the case of Wilson v. City of St. Louis (1990), which involved a Pit Bull named "Max" who was impounded and classified as dangerous because he allegedly killed the neighbors dog. The Circuit Court found that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction was not granted and enjoined the city from killing or otherwise harming Max. The court ordered the city to release Max and change his dangerous designation to potentially dangerous.)


Overriding the Decision - Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

Due process includes more than just going through the motions of a hearing. In fact, even after hearings have been granted, decisions can be challenged as a prejudicial abuse of discretion that is not based on findings of fact or law. (This is what the owners of Boo, a bullmastiff who allegedly bit a child, argued in Williams v. Orange County Animal Control (1996)). In this case, owners should file a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, a judicial remedy issued by a superior court to compel a government officer to do or forbear from doing a specific act, to delay the euthanasia order until the appeal can be heard. This writ of mandamus applies in any situation in which the euthanasia should be stayed, including scenarios in which an original hearing was never given.


Minimum Standards of Due Process for the Hearing

it is now also clear that hearings must meet certain minimum standards. Informal reviews that animal control agencies frequently provide upon the dog owners request often do not fulfill these requirements, because the decision-maker may not be qualified to render the judgment or may not be impartial if he also made the original decision to euthanize the dog. For example, in Phillips v San Luis Obispo County Dept., 228 Cal.Rptr. 101 Cal.App. (2 Dist.,1986), the owners of Missy, a black lab known to have a bad habit of biting children, contested the cities decision to euthanize her. The amicus brief filed by Joyce Tischler of the Animal Legal Defense Fund pointed out the Municipal Codes at issue did not provide for the Animal Regulation Directors orders to be reviewed by the Chief Sanitarian of the County Health Department or the supervising environmental health officer, the two individuals who presided over the first and second hearings.


Challenges to the Ordinance Itself

In fact, many city ordinances are flawed in that they fail to specify that owners are entitled to hearings before their pets are euthanized. These municipal codes can be challenged as unconstitutional and, even if the city already granted hearings that met minimum due process standards, the decision to euthanize the pet would still have to be overturned. Otherwise, whether dog owners generally would receive due process would be at the whim of the animal control agency, and the city could avoid having to correct its municipal codes simply by voluntarily giving all dog owners a hearing. The court of appeals in Missy's case agreed, concluding “that the ordinances here are unconstitutional for failure to provide for notice and a hearing either before or after the seizure of an uncontrollable biting or vicious dog.

Most recently, in a landmark case, the court of appeals in Mansour v. King County, 128 P.3d 1241 (Wash.App. Div. 1,2006) held that due process required even more than offering owners a hearing, ordering that “an agency seeking to enforce a removal order must prove both the violation and the remedy it has imposed by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the same standard of proof imposed on the government when it attempts to temporarily remove a child from the custody of his parents. By instituting a burden of proof on the city, the court was essentially finding that the dog must be presumed innocent until the city can prove otherwise. Previously, there had been no standard of proof, and reviewing courts would only look to see if Animal Control had acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Thus, even the most minimal evidence that a dog should be removed would suffice, and owners would bear the burden of proving their pets innocent. Moreover, the court found that due process attached not only for orders to euthanize an animal, but also for orders of removal outside the county (Peter Mansour had been ordered to remove his dog from the county or turn his dog over to the city to be euthanized after his dog was accused of killing a cat).

Finally, the court held that due process required Mansour to have the ability to subpoena records and witnesses in his defense, and that the Notice and Order of Violation had to specify exactly what code provisions had been violated. Merely issuing a brief and concise description of the conditions for finding the violation is insufficient. Mansour was entitled to know ahead of time exactly what the County needed to prove at the Board hearing. If in fact it could not prove that Maxine violated a code provision that supported the removal order, he [Mansour] was entitled to know that in time to move for a dismissal at the Board level. Source Reference: Animal Legal and Historical Center.


There are some significant problems with dangerous dog laws and euthanasia execution solutions.

1. They do not reduce the number of dog bites. By focusing on the after-effects of a bite, these laws do not take any measures to prevent bites. In theory, the risk of punishment is a motivation to change behavior. But most dog owners do not believe their dogs to be dangerous. So the perception is that these laws are for other dogs, problem dogs, but not their dog. Then, when a bite occurs, that particular owner may face additional liability, but his friends and neighbors will not change their habits regarding their own dogs

2. The laws do not take into account the severity of the incident. Most dangerous dog laws cover a huge range of behavior from "threatening displays" to actual bites. What this means is that you may be as liable for your goofy social dog rushing out the door and charging gleefully at a neighbor as another owner is for an under socialized, aggressive dog who bites a child on the face. Are these equal? Under many dangerous dog laws, they are


What it comes down to is this.

Dangerous dog laws are a feel-good attempt to show the community that we are taking action, even with a goat bite incident.

Unfortunately they do not provide any protective effects, merely punishment after the fact. There are many things this community can do to prevent dog bites, including educating parents, rural families or farmers, and citizens how to supervise and when to intervene in kid-and-dog, or dog-and-coyote, interactions, teaching owners how to socialize and train their dogs with methods that encourage friendly behavior and providing some basic education about canine body language so the many misunderstandings we have with dogs each day can be reduced.


Where's the 'outrage' to save an owner's alleged 'innocent' dog?

This case about this lab dog named Niko who is accused of killing a pet goat in Rowley, MA.is a classic case of a failure in justice for all, as it is alleged by sources of anonymity to this NationalDogPress.com reporter, that there is absolutely no proof, the Animal Control Officer (ACO) was allegedly negligent, and the vet did not follow the proper steps to distinguish between a coyote attack and a dog bite. Additionally, repulsive is the alleged fact (from a source of anonymity), that these Boards of Selectmen are spending 10 minutes with a file and issuing a dog the death sentence, and this should 'outrage' those of us who follow the Constitution and regard dogs as more than chattel.


Dog Owner's Defend Your Dogs from Tyranny by Animal Control Authorities and the judicial systems involving animal control issues and citations.


Dog Owner's Must Demand Due Process BEFORE, your dogs are Removed or Euthanized by Animal Control Authorities. If not you, then WHO, will defend your dogs from tyranny and death.


© NationalDogPress.com Headline News


Article by Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©



Posted by CODE: RED - Final Notice at 12:14 AM 0 comments

Labels: Animal Abuse Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom DogPress.org, AnimalsClubFreedom.org, Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs, IowaCongress.org, NationalDogPress.com


Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

View Entry

Wednesday, May 27th 2009

1:10 AM (37 days, 14h, 11min ago)

A 'Dog Man' is a guy who is not scared of his testosterone!

  • Mood: by Dean A. Ayers

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

A 'Dog Man' is a guy who is not scared of his testosterone!




NationalDogPress.com © Health, Feline, and Animal News Commentary


A 'Dog Man' is a guy who is not scared of his testosterone!


By Dean A. Ayers
Director
Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
http://animalsclubfreedom.us/


26 May 09


In this New Age with pussy cats and feminism it is hard not to become a total wuss; that is the theme of the article. Be a Man with a Dog! AKA: A 'Dog Man."

There is a prize to the person who correctly answers this question, what is a Man?

When asked what women want in a guy, women say simply, "A MAN!" 
But, alas, real men are becoming more and rarer these days.
Women are tired of the sensitive wimps who have no backbones.

One woman even wrote a song about the subject, "Where have all the cowboys gone?" 

So what is a Man? How should a real Man act? Decades and centuries ago, the question was nonsense. But today in our feminized culture (this may be more in America then in other countries), most of us have been raised to believe that there is something inherently wrong with being a man and acting the way how a man should act.

No wonder males don't know how to act around women!

In duty to all Men and deed, I embarked on this mystery to find out the answer to this question.

Several women were bunched up in a group, gossiping and yapping about cute men and boy toys, fashion, relationships i.e. nothing. This behavior extends to all women of all cultures (and also different animal species).

For example, cows group together and moo and gnaw on grass and take notice of bulls brave enough to approach the group. So as a Master of Bull, I approach the ladies and state as follows. "How are you, ladies? I am the Man!" A woman squeals. "Oh! It's a Man!" The others squeal in unison.

Once the ladies calm themselves after being in the presence of a Man, I ask them, "Ladies! 

Do tell me ladies, what do you define as a Man?"

With devilish tongues, the women answer:

- "A Man is someone sensitive to me."
- "A Man is the guy who will take care of my needs." 
- "A Man is the one that is in tune with my feelings."
- "A Man is one who doesn't have an ego." 
- "A Man is the guy who will sit and watch chick flicks all day with me."
- "A Man is the guy who will go shopping with me."
- "A Man is the guy who will share all his feelings with me."

Such are the common answers!

The males listen and actualize what the women say. They are constantly declared 'sweet' and 'wonderful' and 'nice', oh 'so nice'. Mothers and older women are proud of them and tell them, "If I were younger, I would go for you!"

Poor Nice Guy!

The women his own age avoid him like the plague and jump for the jerks. The Nice Guy becomes an emotional tampon to be used and discarded. The Nice Guy, being so nice and sweet, listens to the woman vomit her feelings about men and bleed her problems of her boyfriend on him.

He listens with baited hope when he hears, "Oh, why can't guys be like you! You listen and understand." Then she turns around and gets abused by another jerk! The vicious cycle repeats again and again.

Why are women acting in this way?

They are simply acting as women do, as in their nature. The problem is not with them, it is with guys.

We are afraid to embrace OUR nature, that of being a Man. Being in a culture that sees Manhood as predatory and oppressive and uncouth, we cover it up within ourselves. By doing so, we hide our sexuality.

Sexuality!

Do I mean rock hard abs and rippling muscles? That is not
what women find sexy [it's a contributing factor, not the core].

A type of PERSONALITY is what women are looking for. Someone they can depend on [has backbone], someone who will be successful [has ambition], and someone who is decisive [has charge].

Nice guys have no backbone because they think women are frail things that will break in confrontation; nice guys reveal no ambition because they fear being seen as arrogant to women; nice guys are afraid to be decisive for fear of being seen as 'oppressive'.)

Two poles of thought men drift into: the Nice Guy and the Jerk.

Both blame the other. "You ruin the women with your lack of commitment and unappreciative nature," says the Nice Guy. "You spoil the women with your endless listening ear and stupid caring attitude," replies the Jerk. The two endlessly war.

Those on the sidelines have their own conclusions.

One side says, "The Jerk is the way to go. Ceaseless sex! Evolution demands it." The other side says, "The Nice Guy is the way to go. Glorious relationship! Society demands it." But the two still argue. "You cause the women to think they are in control," says the Jerk. "Ahh, but you cause the women to think all men are scum," replies the Nice Guy. Is there not an end to the Nice Guy vs. Jerk debate? Are these the only choices?

The Cycle the Nice Guy emerges. He is tenderized and wants to shout in every woman's ear "I will not abuse you. I am sweet and good. Based on that alone you should date me."

When the Nice Guy talks to the girl on a date, *poof*, the date turns into Oprah. "Oh, my life has been SO downhill from here," the Nice Guy whines. "My little girly car was slashed, I failed my classes, but because of you this day has been so much better."

Then the Nice Guy goes, "Let me tell you my life story. My birth was long, hard, and
painful for my mother..." Our culture has become so feminized that the Nice Guy thinks it is proper to vomit his feelings and emotions all over the place. (It's gross!) Women, rightfully, run for the hills when they hear your declarations of love.

The Metamorphosis comes.

The Nice Guy eventually realizes what all the ladies want, becomes bitter, and changes himself into a Jerk. His goal now is to sleep with as many women as possible and figure out all the tricks and tactics to do so. He focuses on calculation rather then natural joy. When a woman comes, he pulls out a chart of all the 'moves' and 'tactics' with arrows and patterns. He unleashes his lap top, accesses a Lay Guide, and reviews his strategy. Time passes and once was fun becomes meaningless. Back to being nice. He sees it now as turning on Nice Guy or turning on Jerk.

"Why can't I just be myself!?" he soon thunders at Reality.

Just be a real Man!

There is no need to reprogram yourself. You will have the interests you have, the hobbies you have, the body you have, but you can easily become a MAN. It is all simply in the way how you think and as you think you shall become.

But what is Man?

Shall we have the answer? Here it is: 
A Man is a guy who is not scared of his testosterone!

A Man follows the passion in his life. Passion of women? Of course not.
A Man has goals and desires that goes above that of chasing chicks. After childhood,
there are TRUE winners and losers in life.

A Man desires to be the winner. A Man WANTS to win in what he does.

Because of his passion, a Man can sometimes come off as arrogant and egotistical. He does not apologize for this or for his desires. "It is your actions that cause the disgrace of Men," says the Nice Guy. "It is yours," replies the Jerk. No, gentlemen, the disgrace of men is in not embracing your true nature: following your passion and, thus, loving life.

Women are to enhance your life, not to be your life.

So to the Nice Guy, stop placing your happiness on getting a girlfriend.

To the Jerk, quit wasting your life on seduction. Don't SPEND your time chasing girls, INVEST it by putting it into your interests and desires, thus the whole of your life.

When you do this, all of a sudden you have what every woman wants: Ambition, charge, decisiveness, backbone, kindness, stableness, and confidence.

You are now acting like a Man!

This article is provided to "challenge" your testosterone "Free Agency" so as to make you "think" like a Man, who happens to also own a dog. AKA: The "Dog Man."

Copyright © 2006-2009, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization


by Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."



http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

View Entry

Monday, May 25th 2009

6:12 PM (38 days, 21h, 9min ago)

CAT TAGGING; a form of animal activist satire, like dumb blondes

  • Mood: http://NoDogShit.blogspot.com/

Monday, May 25, 2009

CAT TAGGING; a form of animal activist satire, like dumb blondes



CAT TAGGING; a form of animal activist satire, like dumb blondes

 

COMMENTARY – SATIRE

 

By Art Beck

Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

 

25 May 09

 

Here at the NationalDogPress, instead of a standard category system we use a system called tagging at the end of BLOG articles. This allows a visitor to look at a particular tag and see all the posts in that category thru a search mode.

It generally it works really well. Right up until you get the person that either doesn't understand tags or likes to abuse the system in a vain attempt to get more readers by badmouthing men with dogs.

Let's take a recent example.  A woman who owned many cats recently moaned about the RSS feeds not working properly. Fair enough, if it doesn't work, get it fixed. No problem with that. But. What the heck has RSS problems got to do with the CAT TAGGING of many RSS feeds to intentionally bad mouth the article author? An example of this CAT TAGGING is as follows:

Bad Behavior, Dog Press, cats, women, animals, activists, liberals, News and politics, blondes, Life in general, Photo Sharing, Life, Amazing Facts, Whatever, Blogosphere, Science, Marketing, Business, Blog, photos, Humanity, What The F**k, Entertainment, Politics, Photography, Blogs and Blogging, Girl Stuff, Happy, sex, advertising, the life, Own Story, Genre: Romance, Photo Blogging, quotes, Creativity, Market Analysis, Top 10 Blogs, Top Blogs, daily life, Inside my mind, Photo, General Blogging, Photographs, Cool photos, philosophy & politics, Impeach Bush, Blogroll, Everything, The Story Behind a Photo, Market Research & Intelligence, Marketing Communications, The Marketeer, What if, Beauty, Emarketing, Mind & Spirit, What I'm thinking now, Jokes, Stories From The Heart, What's New, Feeds, President Bush, anger, Emotional, Law & Politics, Feed, Sexual/Sensual, Marketing & Promotion, kids, News Feeds, Intuition, Matters of the Heart, Love, Romance/ Love, Article Marketing, Motherhood, Blonde, Management, Democrats, Internet Marketing, Quotes for Thought, psycho girl, Your Body & Your Life, Marriage, stupidity, Life and loving it., Success!, Quotable Quotes, My Story, Romantic, a-woman-thing, Sexcom, Amazing Stuff, Spiritual Quotes, Sexblogging, sexy, etcetera, Depression, Sadness, Crazy, About Me, Myself and I, Advertisement, joke, George W. Bush, Jokes / Funny Stuff, Who am I?, Pain, Top Headlines, What is real?, Web Marketing, romance, Child abuse and neglect, Jokes and Humor, Today I am listening to confusions, Humor n Joke, Call Me Crazy, Childhood Blogs, Invention, Innovation, Creativity, This Ugly and Beautiful World, confusion, imaginer, stupid secrets, Top 5 Lists, Sexuality, Dumb Blondes, Britney Spears Dumb Blondes to the MAX,  When My Heart Goes Crazy, Hopeless Romantic Me, Girls, Happy Joy, Love/Romance, Imagination, Psychology & The Mind, Offline Marketing Top Tips, believer, Addiction, sad things, girl speak, Love & Relationships, General Confusion, Quotations, I Think, child psychology, Fashion & Beauty, RSS Feeds, sex toys, Democrats & The Left, People smarter than me, of Success, Deflecting them Mind Control Beams with my Nifty Tin Ha, Manly, Sexy living News, Sexy Girls, Britney blonde moments spreading profanity between her legs in photos at bars, drunk on her ass, butt naked for cameras, Confused, happiness, RSS & Web feeds, lover, SMART-TAG, What can you imagine, Victims, Passion, Passions and interests, Believe it or not, Democrat issues, Law of Success, Men Romance, Democrats and Republicans, Sex Toys Blogs, Feminism & Sexuality, imagine the world, Worthy Quotations, Genius in review, Top 10, Lovers, My Married Life, A Blondes Ramblings, I Am, create reality, loving human beings, Am I?, What is memory, Amazing things that happened to me, Married Bliss, Project Advertisement, The unbelievable, The Art of Happiness, Top 5, Being A Woman, Blonde Jokes, Imagine, You wouldn't believe, Can't believe I did it, Adventures in Womanhood, Couples, Pain and suffering, Top 10 Current Best Sellers, married couples, career woman, blackmail, Genius, unbelievable, Blissfulness, intelligent, Why Is It So Hard To Believe You're Beautiful?, sex and sexuality, Top 10 Best, Mind Control, bliss, some imagination required!, Uh, Happiness & Joy, Marriage Equality, foreplay, HELLO GORGEOUS, Gorgeous Women, Lists (My Top 10), thoughts & chaos, Personality disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Major Depression, Relationships & Sexuality, schizophrenia, Romance and Sex, Faith and Sexuality, ugly things, Loving/Hating, Top 10 Lists, I'm Loving You!, General Hatred, Dazed & Confused, Imagine That for ages 3-5 Years, sex talk, Orgasm, Sex Articles, Gorgeous People, the Universe and Everything, Photos / Pictures of Adds, Slightly Confused, Imagine That, Blonde Sense, Gorgeous Online Galleries!, Signs of confusion, Emotional Abuse, Utter confusion, Confused / Confusing, abusive, Ugliness, the unbelievable truth, biography/autobiography, Unbelievable news, Dealing with Grief, Amazed, Pain and Sorrow, Controlled orgasms, Adds, My Hot SEXcapades, the senses, Sexy Women, Passionately in love, stories needed of physical abuse, Beauty & Sexiness, Sexist, quotes that amaze me, multiple orgasms, Hot Sex, physical abuse, passionate, adult sex toys, what am I supposed to do here?, Sexy Men, The sex talk, You Got To Be Joking Me, Top 20 Reviews, Advertisements, Psychology, Abnormal Psychology, Personality

All of these are tags that are attached to the bottom of every single damned post. Why? Are raising cats that damn boring? What purpose does CAT TAGGING serve? You reckon you've already got a readership as they're using your RSS feed. Are you that vain that you need to enter the race for basic bitch popularity using CAT TAGGING examples above?

Oh, and about Dumb Cat Women ‘BLONDE’ Posts with their 'cat claws' out, and their responses I have received in the past; that I and others in this national organization on occasion have received (Intelligent Blondes Excluded of course):

1. Being blonde who own many cats, or friends there of, does not necessarily make you stupid. You are not necessarily stupid just because you are blonde, own cats, and harass men with dogs.

You are stupid. But not because you're blonde or own cats.

2. When you send me photos of yourself naked - If that's you BLONDEE laying by all those cats, in the photo I want proof. I want to see a photo of you with a handwritten sign saying I Love The Cowboy in the NationalDogPress. And PS: Put your clothes back on first.... I am too old to have a heart attack...

Blonde's think they are a demi god. Yeah, Demi God with cats. Women with dogs seem to reflect a lot more intelligence. I know this by their long signature blocks stating so.

I can't accept the title of demi god, as the entire cat loving Dumb Blondes of the world, have that honor! LOL! With the exception of "BRITNEY" No Class you 'cat women.' Buy a dog and sober up or take your meds.

 

There are more pressing animal legislation matters to attend to in life, than criticizing dog people defending your right to emailing blonde notes to men with dogs and their groupies.

 

Commentary Article by Art Beck

Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

View Entry

Sunday, May 24th 2009

1:06 PM (40 days, 2h, 15min ago)

Animal rights perverted 'parent -guardian' dog designation in legislation

  • Mood: A very well written article. Thank you Dean!

Sunday, May 24, 2009

Animal rights perverted 'parent -guardian' dog designation in legislation





Animal rights perverted 'parent -guardian' dog designation in legislation

GLENWOOD, Iowa, May 23 (NationalDogPress.com) --

This is a documentary by the 'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization, designed for people who either own dogs and pets or live near dogs and pets, which is just about everybody. This documentary is an interesting look at how the proposal and implementation of "Anti-Pet Ownership" laws and ordinances that affect all pet and dog owners and their relations with their pet's lives, family unit, and surrounding community.

Introduction of legally defined perversion:

Many of our fellow citizens, no longer have the tolerant souls and morals of free men and women. They have the souls and morals of a now "perverted" mentality as busy-bodies and petty "tyrants" who want to ruin their neighbors' lives, and kill their pets and their pet ownership rights, all in the name of "WHAT?" An Animal's right not to be owned by its master, but rather only be parented or controlled only by a 'parent - guardian' designation? This is perversion of truth at it's deepest core in society, not loving family values with pet ownership property freedom, as well as, having pets accepted as a member of the 'extended family' with the human beings in that family.

Our pets and animals are, in fact, an integral part of our loving family units, having purpose, attention, affection, interaction, respect and family interaction and happiness for both humans and the pet animals. However, the "animal rights activists" and legislative body members (local city, state and federal), who follow the animal rights activist's intentional perversion of loving family pet ownership interactions, have gone astray, from a logical and common sense way of thinking. And these legal proposals are being implemented with intent of "malice to the pet owners, as well as the pet animals."

These animal rights people have become "tyrants" thru the use of our various legal systems, destroying the very freedoms "We" as people have a right to possess in a free society. This is a documentary of the proposal of violations of "Pet Ownership" rights and freedoms.

The "Animal Rights" Activist Problem:

There are people so addicted to exaggeration they can't tell the truth without lying. ~Josh Billings

A strict observance of the written laws is doubtless one of the high duties of a good citizen, but it is not the highest.

The laws of necessity, of self- preservation, of saving our country and our people, to include our extended family pets, when in danger, are of higher obligation.

To lose our beloved pet animals, our family units and structure, an ultimately our freedom in this country by a unscrupulous adherence to written "anti-pet" ordinances and laws would be to lose the law itself, with life, liberty, property, and all those who are enjoying them with us. This is absolute absurdity sacrificing the end to the means.

The "Perverted" List of Anti-Pet Ownership Proposals and Laws:

This is a list of proposed legislation and ordinances designed to take away your pet owning rights, little by little, one perverted step after another, making it so difficult, expensive, inconvenient, and legally risky to even own a dog or any other pet:

1. Mandatory Spay/Neuter
2. Breeder Licensing (destroys hobby breeder who produce some of the
best and well-socialized purebreds)
3. Kennel Licensing w/Privatized Inspections
4. Differential Licensing
5. Potential Dangerous Dog Laws (High Risk Animal Designation)
6. Breed Specific Legislation/Registration 
(higher licensing fees, mandatory insurance minimums, breed-banning, 
mandatory muzzling, length and style of collars and leashes)
7. Anti-tethering and anti-crating Legislation
8. Pet Limit Laws
9. A parent-like 'Guardianship' Designation
10. Husbandry Limiting Laws (FLORIDA tried to make it where only a vet could
worm dogs!)
11. Animal Control attempting to force 'euthanasia' on owner's pets or be charged with criminal animal abuse for maintaining old age pets with 'naturally' failing health issues
12. Anti-Hunting Laws
13. Anti-Fighting Laws (actually used to legislate hunting, coursing, by
animal on animal being considered fighting)
14. Mandatory RFID "Chip" Micro-chipping
15. Pet Licensing Public Data Bases (The whole world can read all about
your pets and know where you live!)
16. Legislating Unreasonable Medical Care Responsibility
17. Mandatory Temperament Testing
18. Purely Positive Training Methods 
[Criminalizing Training Devices (training collars) or methods that
include corrections
19. Containment Restrictions 
(height and type of fences, size of property, kennels, crates)
20. Mandated Care Requirements 
(dog must be walked 30 minutes each day)
21. Greater Police Powers by Animal Control Agencies to Enter Your
Property and Seize without warrants
22. Private Citizen/Agency Seizures ("BAD" Samaritan Laws) 
(allowing a private citizen or agency to remove an animal from your
property that they consider at risk)
23. Size limits and 'pet quantity' limits when no dog problems of care and maintenance exist
24. Anti-Cropping/Docking/De-clawing Legislation 
(but yet they will carve out your dogs internal reproductive organs!)
25. Out-lawing "Deformed" Breeds (English Bulldogs, Basset Hounds, etc.)
26. Legislation based on faulty research studies -- correlation studies
rather than causative (Did you know all people who drink water die?
Therefore we need to stop drinking water!) Correlation is not Causation!
27. Some European Countries, it is illegal to have a dog pull you that is not a northern breed?
AND THE NEWEST TWO that make it illegal for Martha Stewart to own a dog:
28. Limited Ownership of Dogs by Convicted Felons
29. Defining dogs as Weapons and making it illegal to use a dog as a
"weapon" (so long home protection)
30. Mandatory Animal Reporting and Identification programs (local, city, state, and federal systems)
31. ALL Breed Anti-Pet Ordinances (first used in Alta, Utah, and now in Louisville, KY in a 100 page ordinance, controlled by essentially one man (director of Animal Control) over every citizen with a pet or animal).
32. National Animal Identification System (NAIS)

Intelligence in legislation never meant an exercise in definitions of 'Perversion' with pet property ownership:

The most ridiculous, most despicable of all con artists are those pompous, condescending, so-called 'intellectuals' who purport to use the intellect to 'prove' the worthlessness of human intelligence, in loving pet ownership family unit relationships -- and thereby, of the intellect.

They, the "animal rights" perverts, don't even seem to realize all they're doing is admitting their own self-negation in the most pathetic way possible, in public, to all but the most gullible."

Loving pet ownership and its responsible exercise of pet 'property ownership' freedom is natural, desired by both animal and human, and a God given right to happiness. I prove my point in that, Noah, was tasked by God himself, to build a boat, large enough to protect and maintain every animal and creature on this earth, prior to its destruction. Had the animal rights activists, been left in charge of this most important task, I have no doubt all the animals of the earth would have been destroyed...

In Summary and Defense of Pet Ownership Property Rights:

I care not much for a man's religion whose dog and cat are not the better for it. ~Abraham Lincoln

Animal Rights is not a "right" of stance to protect the animals. It is in place to "destroy" the animals and the moral, legal, and religious ethics of lovingly owning and maintaining their pet animals. GOD GIVEN RIGHTS!

Just ask Noah in the ARK!

• Return to Website •

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

Posted by http://DogPress.org/ at 12:39 AM 

Labels: Animal Cruelty NationalDogPress.com, Animal rights perverted 'parent -guardian' dog designation in legislation, Animalid.biz animalsclubfreedom.us AnimalsClubFreedom.us DogPress.org

View Entry

Friday, May 22nd 2009

3:04 AM (42 days, 12h, 17min ago)

Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs

Friday, May 22, 2009

Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs

Article Link: http://pets.groups.yahoo.com/group/Animals_Club_Freedom/message/8617

Demand 'Due Process' Before the Government Can Remove Your Dogs




Demand Due Process Before the Animal Control Authorities Can Remove or Euthanize Your Dogs by Tyranny.


Due Process Should be Provided to Dog Owners Before the Government can Remove or Euthanize Their Dogs


How Does Due Process Apply to Dog Seizure/Euthanasia Cases?

Despite the fact that animals are still considered property in all legal jurisdictions today, due process, whether rooted in the federal or state constitutions, extends to life, liberty, or property. The more complicated issue, however, is how much process is due?

The Supreme Court has promulgated a four prong test to determine this. In each situation, a court must weigh

-the private interest affected by the official action

-the risk of an erroneous deprivation of that interest through the procedures used,

-the probable value of additional procedural safeguards, and

-the government interest involved.



Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976).

Due process requires the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.

Rabon v. City of Seattle (Rabon II), 107 Wash.App. 734, 743 (2001) (citing Mathews, 424 U.S. at 333). Thus, when individuals can show they will suffer irreparable harm from a post-deprivation hearing, courts have recognized that a pre-deprivation hearing is necessary. In the case of orders to euthanize pets, many courts have considered the loss to the pet owner as irreparable.


Before the Hearing: Filing a Petition for a Preliminary Injunction

Dog owners should file a petition for an injunction to delay the killing of the dog until they have had the chance to be heard in court (For an actual example, see Petition for Preliminary and Permanent Injunction in the case of Wilson v. City of St. Louis (1990), which involved a Pit Bull named "Max" who was impounded and classified as dangerous because he allegedly killed the neighbors dog. The Circuit Court found that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm if the preliminary injunction was not granted and enjoined the city from killing or otherwise harming Max. The court ordered the city to release Max and change his dangerous designation to potentially dangerous.)


Overriding the Decision - Petition for a Writ of Mandamus

Due process includes more than just going through the motions of a hearing. In fact, even after hearings have been granted, decisions can be challenged as a prejudicial abuse of discretion that is not based on findings of fact or law. (This is what the owners of Boo, a bullmastiff who allegedly bit a child, argued in Williams v. Orange County Animal Control (1996)). In this case, owners should file a Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, a judicial remedy issued by a superior court to compel a government officer to do or forbear from doing a specific act, to delay the euthanasia order until the appeal can be heard. This writ of mandamus applies in any situation in which the euthanasia should be stayed, including scenarios in which an original hearing was never given.


Minimum Standards of Due Process for the Hearing

It is now also clear that hearings must meet certain minimum standards. Informal reviews that animal control agencies frequently provide upon the dog owners request often do not fulfill these requirements, because the decision-maker may not be qualified to render the judgment or may not be impartial if he also made the original decision to euthanize the dog. For example, in Phillips v San Luis Obispo County Dept., 228 Cal.Rptr. 101 Cal.App. (2 Dist.,1986), the owners of Missy, a black lab known to have a bad habit of biting children, contested the citys decision to euthanize her. The amicus brief filed by Joyce Tischler of the Animal Legal Defense Fund pointed out the Municipal Codes at issue did not provide for the Animal Regulation Directors orders to be reviewed by the Chief Sanitarian of the County Health Department or the supervising environmental health officer, the two individuals who presided over the first and second hearings.


Challenges to the Ordinance Itself

In fact, many city ordinances are flawed in that they fail to specify that owners are entitled to hearings before their pets are euthanized. These municipal codes can be challenged as unconstitutional and, even if the city already granted hearings that met minimum due process standards, the decision to euthanize the pet would still have to be overturned. Otherwise, whether dog owners generally would receive due process would be at the whim of the animal control agency, and the city could avoid having to correct its municipal codes simply by voluntarily giving all dog owners a hearing. The court of appeals in Missy's case agreed, concluding “that the ordinances here are unconstitutional for failure to provide for notice and a hearing either before or after the seizure of an uncontrollable biting or vicious dog.

Most recently, in a landmark case, the court of appeals in Mansour v. King County, 128 P.3d 1241 (Wash.App. Div. 1,2006) held that due process required even more than offering owners a hearing, ordering that “an agency seeking to enforce a removal order must prove both the violation and the remedy it has imposed by a preponderance of the evidence. This is the same standard of proof imposed on the government when it attempts to temporarily remove a child from the custody of his parents. By instituting a burden of proof on the city, the court was essentially finding that the dog must be presumed innocent until the city can prove otherwise. Previously, there had been no standard of proof, and reviewing courts would only look to see if Animal Control had acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Thus, even the most minimal evidence that a dog should be removed would suffice, and owners would bear the burden of proving their pets innocent. Moreover, the court found that due process attached not only for orders to euthanize an animal, but also for orders of removal outside the county (Peter Mansour had been ordered to remove his dog from the county or turn his dog over to the city to be euthanized after his dog was accused of killing a cat).

Finally, the court held that due process required Mansour to have the ability to subpoena records and witnesses in his defense, and that the Notice and Order of Violation had to specify exactly what code provisions had been violated. Merely issuing a brief and concise description of the conditions for finding the violation is insufficient. Mansour was entitled to know ahead of time exactly what the County needed to prove at the Board hearing. If in fact it could not prove that Maxine violated a code provision that supported the removal order, he [Mansour] was entitled to know that in time to move for a dismissal at the Board level. Source Reference: Animal Legal and Historical Center.


There are some significant problems with dangerous dog laws and euthanasia execution solutions.

1. They do not reduce the number of dog bites. By focusing on the after-effects of a bite, these laws do not take any measures to prevent bites. In theory, the risk of punishment is a motivation to change behavior. But most dog owners do not believe their dogs to be dangerous. So the perception is that these laws are for other dogs, problem dogs, but not their dog. Then, when a bite occurs, that particular owner may face additional liability, but his friends and neighbors will not change their habits regarding their own dogs

2. The laws do not take into account the severity of the incident. Most dangerous dog laws cover a huge range of behavior from "threatening displays" to actual bites. What this means is that you may be as liable for your goofy social dog rushing out the door and charging gleefully at a neighbor as another owner is for an undersocialized, aggressive dog who bites a child on the face. Are these equal? Under many dangerous dog laws, they are


What it comes down to is this.

Dangerous dog laws are a feel-good attempt to show the community that we are taking action, even with a goat bite incident.

Unfortunately they do not provide any protective effects, merely punishment after the fact. There are many things this community can do to prevent dog bites, including educating parents, rural families or farmers, and citizens how to supervise and when to intervene in kid-and-dog, or dog-and-coyote, interactions, teaching owners how to socialize and train their dogs with methods that encourage friendly behavior and providing some basic education about canine body language so the many misunderstandings we have with dogs each day can be reduced.


Where's the 'outrage' to save an owner's alleged 'innocent' dog?

This case about this lab dog named Niko who is accused of killing a pet goat in Rowley, MA.is a classic case of a failure in justice for all, as it is alleged by sources of anonymity to this NationalDogPress.com reporter, that there is absolutely no proof, the Animal Control Officer (ACO) was allegedly negligent, and the vet did not follow the proper steps to distinguish between a coyote attack and a dog bite. Additionally, repulsive is the alleged fact (from a source of anonymity), that these Boards of Selectmen are spending 10 minutes with a file and issuing a dog the death sentence, and this should 'outrage' those of us who follow the Constitution and regard dogs as more than chattel.
 
Dog Owner's Defend Your Dogs from Tyranny by Animal Control Authorities.
 
Dog Owner's Must Demand Due Process BEFORE, your dogs are Removed or Euthanized by Animal Control Authorities. If not you, then WHO, will defend your dogs from tyranny and death.


© NationalDogPress.com Headline News

Article by Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

  
View Entry

Tuesday, May 19th 2009

2:02 AM (45 days, 13h, 19min ago)

Animal Control Laws are Vital to the Public Good? NOT!

Monday, May 18, 2009

Animal Control Laws are Vital to the Public Good? NOT!

Animal Control Laws are Vital to the Public Good? NOT!

By Dean A. Ayers
Lead Investigative Reporter
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©
19 May 09


Question:

When were people guaranteed an inalienable right to own, breed or sell animals without government regulation? 


It’s a two part Answer:

Answer 1: 4 July 1776 – We the People, call this an “intrinsic” inalienable right, "The Declaration of Independence."

Answer 2: A dog's life has 'intrinsic value,' New York judge finds.

Finding that a dog "is somewhere between a person and personal property," a New York trial court said a pet owner whose dog died following unauthorized surgery may seek damages beyond the purchase price of the animal. 

"[A dog] is not an inanimate thing that just receives affection; it also returns it," the court wrote, citing Corso v. Crawford, 97 Misc. 2d 530 (N.Y., Queens County Civ. Ct. 1979). 


Our dogs, cats, pets, and animals are identified as our “intrinsic” inalienable right of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness as an intrinsic valued "extended" family member. Dogs are "intrinsic living beings" with a soul, given by God.

Every citizen is only bound to obey his or her governing official to the degree that the governing official does not violate the duty of the citizen to obey the 'higher powers' which, for Americans, are God and the U.S. Constitution."

God commands our obedience not to ungodly, despotic rulers, whose 'authority,' according to God's Word, is illegitimate and unlawful by virtue of such persons' rebellion against God’s Authority – from which all lawful authority must derive and be answerable to, "The Declaration of Independence."

Specifically, the answer to "when were people guaranteed an inalienable right to own, breed or sell animals without government regulation?" is answered specifically as documented by our fore fathers in "The Declaration of Independence" as an "intrinsic value" of life as follows: 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are an "intrinsic" value of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."


The Declaration of Independence: A Transcription

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. 

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. 

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:
For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:
For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: 
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences
For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighboring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. 

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. 

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The 56 signatures on the Declaration appear in the positions indicated:

Column 1
Georgia:
Button Gwinnett
Lyman Hall
George Walton

Column 2
North Carolina:
William Hooper
Joseph Hewes
John Penn
South Carolina:
Edward Rutledge
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton

Column 3
Massachusetts:
John Hancock
Maryland:
Samuel Chase
William Paca
Thomas Stone
Charles Carroll of Carrollton
Virginia:
George Wythe
Richard Henry Lee
Thomas Jefferson
Benjamin Harrison
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee
Carter Braxton

Column 4
Pennsylvania:
Robert Morris
Benjamin Rush
Benjamin Franklin
John Morton
George Clymer
James Smith
George Taylor
James Wilson
George Ross
Delaware:
Caesar Rodney
George Read
Thomas McKean

Column 5
New York:
William Floyd
Philip Livingston
Francis Lewis
Lewis Morris
New Jersey:
Richard Stockton
John Witherspoon
Francis Hopkinson
John Hart
Abraham Clark

Column 6
New Hampshire:
Josiah Bartlett
William Whipple
Massachusetts:
Samuel Adams
John Adams
Robert Treat Paine
Elbridge Gerry
Rhode Island:
Stephen Hopkins
William Ellery
Connecticut:
Roger Sherman
Samuel Huntington
William Williams
Oliver Wolcott
New Hampshire:
Matthew Thornton

Now have I answered your above question regarding when were people guaranteed an inalienable right to own, breed or sell animals without government regulation? 

Yes, I believe I have satisfactorily and factually answered the question. Period.

by Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

Posted by CODE: RED - Final Notice 

Labels: Animal Control Laws, AnimalsClubFreedom.org AnimalsClubFreedom.us DogPress.org DogLaw-AnimalsClubFreedom, Dog Law, NationalDogPress.com

View Entry

Saturday, May 16th 2009

5:11 AM (48 days, 10h, 10min ago)

Danny and Cindi Henshaw Massacre; COVER- Boar war: Pig slaughter raises questions

  • Mood: This is not over yet.

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Danny and Cindi Henshaw Massacre; COVER- Boar war: Pig slaughter raises questions





COVER- Boar war: Pig slaughter raises questions
By LISA PROVENCE
Published October 5, 2006 in issue 0540 of the Hook 



Please read this major life altering incident at the Source Article and Comment link:

http://www.readthehook.com/stories/2006/10/05/COVER-boarSlaughter-F.doc.aspx#comments


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

My name is Sara Beth Cannon. I’m 16 years of age, and I’m the niece of Cindi and Danny Henshaw. I lived through what happened to them. I watched as my aunt and Uncles life slowly crumbled away. They were depending on their pigs for retirement, obviously that isn’t going to happen. When this first happened, I did not fully comprehend what was really going on; but I have done my homework. This was outrageous and unfair. Why weren’t they first notified of possible diseased pigs? Why was my aunt placed under guard, when she obviously could do nothing to stop them?


The government delivered a blow to my aunt and uncle that was meant to break their spirit; meant to take the fight out of them. Well, it has had the exact opposite effect.


People began to come forward; they helped them back to their feet. Then, they shared their stories. In doing so, they showed Cindi and Danny that there is a way to fight back. I’m proud of my aunt and uncle. And I can’t think of a better way to express it to them, then by expressing it to you.


Cindi and Danny now live in a camper out west, working round the clock, trying to pay the debt that they should not have to pay.

Above comment posted by Sara Beth Cannon at 1/28/2009 8:12:57 AM 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There comes a time in life when a person or persons in this nation, have to take a stand in life against tyranny.


And to date, many years later after this incident, it would appear to readers that the tyranny of government has won.


Even JOB, in the Bible, was taken to life's task in every aspect of his total life, liberty, and property, to include his family taken from him, not with standing his private property and family ground. Just for God and the Devil to see if his unknown tyranny against him by the devil himself would break JOB's eternal spirit. And yet, JOB remained faithful unto God and in the Light of God forever. That did not make it any easier for JOB to bear, but JOB passed the test of God in life.


By God and by Oath to God and the Henshaw's, One by One by one, will I insure the world KNOWS there IS TYRANNY in the United States of America, and it has taken the initial strike at Danny and Cindi Henshaw.


Let all who read this KNOW, that tyranny, HAS NOT WON!


I originally filed in this incident, by FAX, an official request for a USDA-OIG independent investigation into intentional misconduct by the USDA agents involved in this matter.


To date, it goes unanswered by the USDA-OIG responsible for investigation of criminal acts of tyranny in the USDA.


You can begin, by writing the USDA-OIG and demand that an official inquiry into federal and state agency misconduct be investigated per my original complaint faxed to the USDA-OIG, and the TRUTH be told, and disclosed, independently done, to clear the Henshaw's name.


The legacy of this incident in harming Danny and Cindi Henshaw, stands as a "Beacon of Light" to the world that tyranny and evil still exist in this nation and in the world, yet, We as People, can and will stand our ground. We the People must continue to overcome all tyranny cast upon our lives and souls.


The government of the people, was WRONG!


Danny and Cindi Henshaw are innocent.


I will not rest until this assassination incident has been properly investigated and the Henshaw's name cleared. I 'stake' my life on it!


Please people, all who read this, begin by reading and spreading the word of this article, and the web site locations where it is also publicly available for reading to the world, namely at the following URL link:

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/


Go to: http://animalsclubfreedom.org/tyranny.html


Scroll to the bottom of the page for their story and links to the truth disclosed in the "Henshaw Massacre."


Also you may Google the "Henshaw Massacre."


Tyranny can kill the body, pets and property, but tyranny can never kill the living spirit within each of us.


Danny and Cindi Henshaw are innocent. Help us get the USDA-OIG to prove it! Write the USDA-OIG and demand the USDA-OIG complaint originally made by Dean A. Ayers, be investigated.

Posted by Dean A. Ayers, Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization at 5/16/2009 4:47:04 AM 



Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

View Entry

Sunday, May 10th 2009

6:37 PM (53 days, 20h, 43min ago)

THE AGE OF INSANITY IN SOCIETY, CALLED “THE ONE”

  • Mood: http://economyisworsethandivorce.blogspot.com/

Sunday, May 10, 2009

THE AGE OF INSANITY IN SOCIETY, CALLED “THE ONE”


THE AGE OF INSANITY IN SOCIETY, CALLED “THE ONE”

NationalDogPress.com Headline News © Commentary

10 May 09

And it came to pass in the Age of Insanity that the people of the land calledAmerica, having lost their morals, their work initiative, and their will to defend their liberties, chose as their Supreme Leader that person known as "The One". 

He emerged from the vapors with a message that had no meaning; but He hypnotized the people telling them, "I am sent to save you. My lack of experience, my questionable ethics, my monstrous ego, and my association with evil doers are of no consequence. For I shall save you with Hope and Change. Go, therefore, and proclaim throughout the land that he who preceded me is evil, that he has defiled the nation, and that all he has built must be destroyed." 


And the people rejoiced, for even though they knew not what "The One" would do, he had promised that he would bring change, and they proclaimed "Yes We Can". 

And then He said, "Redistribution of wealth is good for everybody" And the people said, "Show us the money!"

And Joe the plumber asked, "Are you kidding me?" You're going to steal my money and give it to the deadbeats? 

And "The One" ridiculed and taunted him, and Joe's personal records were hacked, publicized, and ridiculed; though no crime could be found. 

One lone reporter asked, "That shouldn't be, isn't that Marxist policy?" And she was banished from the kingdom! 

Then a citizen asked, "With no foreign relations experience and having zero military experience or knowledge, how will you deal with radical terrorists?" 

And "The One" said, "Simple. I shall sit with them and talk kindly to them and show them how nice we really are; and they will forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!" 

And the people said, "Hallelujah!! We are safe at last, and we can beat our weapons into free cars for the people!" 

Then "The One" said, "I shall give 95% of you lower taxes." And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes." So "The One" said, "Then I shall give you some of the taxes the fat-cats pay!" And the people said, "Hallelujah!! Show us the money!" 

Then "The One" said, "I shall tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!" And the people yawned and the already slumping housing market fully collapsed. 

And He said, "I shall mandate employer-funded health care for EVERY worker and raise the minimum wage, and lower the white collar wage. And I shall also give every person unlimited healthcare and medicine and even transportation to the free clinics." 

And the people said, "Give me some of that!" 

Then he said, "I shall penalize employers who ship jobs overseas." 

And the people said, "Where's my rebate check?" 

Then "The One" said, "I shall bankrupt the coal industry, and perhaps even the oil industry (Cap & Trade/Carbon Tax) and though electricity rates will skyrocket, we shall soon build wind farms and solar power stations and drive green cars that I shall mandate in Detroit!" 

And the people said, "Coal is dirty, coal is evil, no more coal! But we don't care for that part about higher electric rates." 

So "The One" said, "Not to worry. If your rebate ($10/week) isn't enough to cover your extra expenses ($3,000/year), we shall bail you out. Just sign up with ACORN and your troubles are over! Only the fat cats will have to pay." 

Then He said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted. Let's grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing..." 

And the people said, "Hallelujah!!" And they made him King! 

And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers; though they sold much less of their products. 

Others simply gave up and went out of business, and the economy sank like unto a rock dropped from a cliff. The banking industry was destroyed. Manufacturing slowed to a crawl. And more of the people were without a means of support. 

So "The One" again blamed the prior administration, extended unemployment benefits to a year, bailed out his favorite banks, and then took over the banks and auto industries. 

"The One" said, "I am the "The One" - The Messiah - and I'm here to save you! We shall just print more money so the government will have enough! Surely one trillion dollars will make everyone happy." And immediately the Fed complied and the money presses roared. 

And China reconsidered their one trillion dollars of loans to the US, and threatened to call in their debts. 

Other foreign trading partners said unto "The One", "Wait a minute... Your dollar is not worth a pile of camel dung! You will have to pay more for everything as your dollar becomes worth less." 

And the people said, "Wait a minute that is unfair!" 

And the world said, "Neither are these other idiotic programs you have embraced. Lo, you have become a Socialist state and a second-rate power. What factories are not owned by your government is owned by us. Now you shall play by our rules!" 

And "The One" said "Americans are arrogant, divisive, and derisive! We will listen." 

And the people cried out, "Alas, alas!! What have we done?" 

But yea verily, it shortly will be too late. The people eventually will set upon "The One" and spat on him and threaten to stone him, and his name will be known as "camel dung". But the once mighty nation will be no more; and the once proud people were without sustenance or shelter or hope or freedom to speak and lawfully act to save this land. 

And the Change that "The One" had given them was as like unto a poison that had destroyed them from within, and like a whirlwind that consumed all that they had built. 

And the people will soon beat their chests in despair and cry out in anguish, "Give us back our nation, our pride, and our hope with freedom and liberty of choice!" 

 

But is it too late for America, to be the Land of the Free?

The once-glorious "Home of the Brave and Land of the Free" will be no more, if We the People, who are “INDEPENDENTS” stop our "brave actions" by stopping to have teas parties, and stop caring or being concerned for our United States Constitution, stop talking about the national take over of religion by Islam, and writing, documenting, and continually speaking the “real truth” about “The One.”

Only thru "independent" media channels, and stopping to think that We the People can actually, in point and fact, still make a difference can this insane national society be saved from "The One". One by One, by one each of us “can” still make a difference in America to save her torch of freedom, called liberty. But time to have a "positive and constructive" lawful effect is growing short, very quickly.

If you believe that you cannot make a "positive and constructive" difference to the defense of your own family, to include your extended family of pet(s) and property ownership freedom, from tyranny of "The One," his people, and his ACORN organizations, then you won't, in fact, make any difference to save your own liberty and freedom!

I Dean A. Ayers, Lead Investigative Reporter, NationalDogPress.com State: “Never under-estimate the power of one.” “That's YOU!”

 

###

 

Posted by Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas StateCommissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

View Entry

Friday, May 8th 2009

12:49 AM (56 days, 14h, 32min ago)

U.K. - Jacqui Smith's latest disaster: Banned U.S. Michael Savage

  • Mood: STAND BY MICHAEL SAVAGE AMERICA!

U.K. - Jacqui Smith's latest disaster: Banned U.S. Michael Savage never even tried to visit Britain - now he's suing

By JAMES SLACK and NICOLA BODEN
Last updated at 1:43 AM on 07th May 2009

 

A U.S. citizen, 'Michael Savage' is a radio DJ named among 16 extremists and fanatics banned from the UK has said he will sue Jacqui Smith for defamation.
 

Michael Savage, who has up to 10 million listeners, branded Home Secretary Jacqui Smith a 'lunatic' and a 'witch' after being named alongside hate preachers and a member of Hamas.

Last night lawyers suggested he had a strong case as he had not advocated violence, unlike others on the list. It was thought he could claim up to £200,000 in damages.

Enlarge http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/05/06/article-1177428-04D1A0A2000005DC-442_468x579_popup.jpg

Furious: Radio host Michael Savage wants to sue the Government for defamation after being included on the list of people banned from the UK

The presenter is furious at being put on the list of 22 hardliners banned from entering the UK because the Home Office claims they have fostered extremism or hatred.

He says he had not been planning to travel to Britain anyway and has now called on his millions of listeners to boycott the country.

Mr Savage added: 'It's interesting to me that here I am a talk show host, who does not advocate violence, who advocates patriotic traditional values – borders, language, culture – who is now on a list banned in England.

'What does that say about the government of England? It says more about them than it says about me.' 

 

The list has turned into another humiliating gaffe for the Home Secretary after officials were forced to admit not all the fanatics, like Mr Savage, wanted to come to the UK.

It has emerged their names were placed on it simply on the off-chance they may decide to visit.

At least two - teenage skinheads Artur Ryno and Pavel Skachevsky - have no chance of boarding a plane to Britain since they are currently serving ten years in a Russian jail for leading a gang which committed 20 racially-motivated murders.

Challenged to say how many on the banned list had been planning to visit Britain, a Home Office spokesman said today: 'I do not have that information.'

Mr Savage declared: 'I have been banned from Great Britain. I had not planned on going there, I had not been there in over 25 years.

'When I woke up this morning I just thought I could not be true. The point is that today it is me, tomorrow it will be somebody else.'

Using his show The Savage Nation, which is broadcast on more than 350 U.S. radio stations, to attack the ban, he called Miss Smith a 'witch'.

'For her to link me up with skinheads who are killing people in Russia, to put me in league with mass murderers who kill Jews on buses, is defamation,' he claimed.

'I thought this was a joke or a mistake. How could they put Michael Savage in the same league with mass murderers when I have never avowed violence? As a result of this, I am going to sue.'

He added: 'When has this witch heard my show, since it's not syndicated in England?'

MIKE SAVAGE

ON ISLAM
: 'You know, when I see a woman walking around with a burqa, I see a Nazi.'
He has called the Koran 'a book of hate' and added that some Muslims, at least, 'need deportation'.


ON AUTISM: He referred to the rise in diagnosis of autism as 'a racket' designed to get disability payments for 'poorer families who have found a new way to be parasites on the government'.

'You know what autism is? I'll tell you what autism is. In 99 per cent of the cases, it's a brat who hasn't been told to cut the act out.' 

ON SWINE FLU: 'Make no mistake about it: Illegal aliens (immigrants) are the carriers of the new strain of human-swine avian flu from Mexico'
 

Mr Savage, real name Michael Weiner, even argued that Miss Smith had put his life in danger.

‘She has painted a target on my back, linking me with people who are in prison for killing people,’ he said. ‘Does she not think people might hunt me down?’

The Home Office claims the DJ has caused great offence with his hardline views on immigration, Islam, rape and autism.

Miss Smith said the list was aimed at naming and shaming extremists and to demonstrate behaviour the Government will not tolerate.

But the move appears to have backfired spectacularly at a time when her job is already hanging by a thread after a string of expense scandals.

Despite Mr Savage's trenchant views, rival broadcasters have leapt to his defence and even civil libertarians and the Council for American-Islamic Relations have spoken out against the ban.

'As a host who witnessed first hand the hate speech not only tolerated but encouraged by the UK, I am appalled and amused at the suggestion that Michael Savage is banned from the UK for his speech,' Rusty Humphries of Talk Radio Network said.

'Thank God we broke away from that cowardly country.'

Broadcaster Lars Larson added: 'I often disagree with the way that Michael Savage says things. I think he's often rude and crude unnecessarily. But isn't that precisely the point?

'That is exactly the kind of speech the founders of our country meant to protect with the First Amendment.

'And it should send a cold chill through the heart of any man who loves freedom when he asks himself, "whose ideas and speech will be banned by government next".'

Jameel Jaffer, an attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, told the San Francisco Chronicle that the move showed countries were prepared to 'use their borders as a weapon of censorship'.

'While some of these people may express views that others find disagreeable, often the cure is worse than the disease,' said Mr Jaffer. 'It also deprives the citizens of that country of their ability to hear dissenting views.'

said today Mr Savage may have a strong case to sue the Home Secretary over the ban.

Mark Stephens, of the London law firm Finers Stephens Innocent, said: 'The people on the list who have been banned are supposed to be advocating extreme violence and so to put him into that category is clearly defamatory.

'His views, such as those on homosexuals, may be offensive but that is another thing entirely. The Home Secretary appears not to have appreciated the difference between tolerance and defamation.'

The effectiveness of the ban has also been questioned because by targeting the presenter, he has been drawn to the attention of millions around the world who can access his opinions online.

Ibrahim Hooper from the Council for American-Islamic Relations said it would just give the presenter a bigger audience.

'As a matter of principle, we don't support such bans. They tend to be selective, in that only popular speech is allowed and unpopular speech is not allowed,' he said.

'Usually, these types of things (the ban) just give people like this publicity. I don't think Savage will be too upset. It will give him something to talk about on his show for the next six months.'

'Witch': Jacqui Smith today. She insists it is right to exclude Mr Savage because of his hardline views

Explaining his reaction on his radio show, Mr Savage at first appeared amused.

He poked fun at British food and the state of people's teeth: 'My first thought was, damn, there goes the summer trip where I planned to have my dental work done.

'My second thought was, darn, there goes my visit to the restaurants of England for their great cuisine,' he said.

But then he turned on 'this lunatic' Jacqui Smith.

More damagingly for Britain as a whole, he also called on his 'eight to 10 million listeners' to cancel their trips to England and stop buying English products.

'I don't know what they make there any more, but whatever they make, I suggest you don't buy it,' he said. 'If they want to play hardball, we'll play hardball.'

The Home Secretary insisted this morning that including Mr Savage on the list was right because he fell into the category of people who can 'foment hatred'.

His extreme views and the way he expresses them 'is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence' if he was allowed into the UK, she claimed.

'Coming to this country is a privilege,' she said.'If you can't live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you.'

Those banned include Hamas MP Yunis Al-Astal and 'hate' preachers Wadgy Abd El Hamied Mohamed Ghoneim, Abdullah Qadri Al Ahdal, Safwat Hijazi and Amir Siddique.

Also barred were murderer and Hezbollah terrorist Samir Al Quntar, Kashmiri terror group leader Nasr Javed and Islamic activist Abdul Ali Musa, who claims 9/11 was a Jewish conspiracy.

White supremacists - including former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard Stephen Donald Black and neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe - were also targeted, alongside American Baptist pastor Fred Waldron Phelps Snr and his daughter Shirley.

'For her (Jacqui Smith) to link me up with skinheads who are killing people in Russia, to put me in league with mass murderers who kill Jews on buses, is defamation. 

'I thought this was a joke or a mistake.
 When has this witch heard my show, since it's not syndicated in England?'
 

Miss Smith said: 'It's important that people understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it's a privilege to come, and the sort of things that mean you won't be welcome in this country.'

But Shadow Home Secretary Chris Grayling argued: 'What we need from the Government is not the gimmick of a name and shame list but a consistent strategy on who can and can't come into the country.'

Anti-extremist groups welcomed the Home Secretary's actions, which follow years of criticism that the Government had been too willing to let in fanatics - including Islamic preachers of hate.

The exclusion of Black, who has been pictured alongside BNP leader Nick Griffin, was praised by the anti-fascist group Searchlight.

It said: 'The preachers of division and hate have no place here.'

But even here, concerns have been raised about freedom of speech and the ever growing power of the law as well as a ban's effectiveness.

Dr Muhammad Abdul Bari of the Muslim Council of Britain said: 'What the Government appears to be doing instead is creating a sort of pre-crime.

'We would also ask how effective the Government's measures will be when it is a fact that a person's images and speech can easily be broadcast across borders via the internet.' 

The remaining six names of those banned since October last year were kept secret in the interests of national security.


WHILE MIKE SAVAGE IS BANNED, HERE ARE SOME OF THOSE ALLOWED TO STAY IN THIS COUNTRY:

Abu Qatada

Osama Bin Laden's top man in the UK. He is in jail fighting an attempt to extradite him to Jordan on terrorism charges.



Learco Chindamo

The 28-year-old, who killed headmaster Stephen Lawrence in 1995, is free to stay in the UK after lawyers claimed that deportation to Italy would 'breach his right to a family life'.


Ahsan Sabri

A Pakistani illegal immigrant who killed a young writer by driving into her at 60mph, he cannot be deported due to his human right to a family life. Sabri, who had been driving uninsured and unlicenced had married a British woman.

Caliph Ali Asmar

Iraqui Kurd asylum seeker jailed for two years for unlawful wounding. After serving eight months he was released and went on to rape a woman and stab a love rival. He is now in jail indefinitely.


Gary Glitter

Real name Paul Gadd, he served almost three years in prison in Vietnam for sex crimes involving two young girls. The former pop star, who returned to the UK in August,  also served two months in jail in 1999 for possessing child pornography.


Dr Philip Nitschke

The euthanasia activist was dubbed 'Dr Death' after bringing the first of his suicide workshops to the UK yesterday. Nitschke has helped four people die in his native Australia, but in the UK assisted suicide is illegal with a maximum punishment of 14 years in prison.


AND HERE ARE THOSE EXCLUDED FROM THE UK SINCE OCTOBER:

Yunis Al Astal

Extremist preacher. Banned because he is considered to be engaging in unacceptable behaviour, including justifying or glorifying terrorist violence.



Wadgy Abd El Hamied Mohamed Ghoneim

Extremist preacher and a prolific speaker and writer. Considered to be attempting to provoke others to commit terrorist acts.



Erich Gliebe

Ran record label Resistance Records for neo-Nazi bands and leader of American neo-Nazi group.



Shirley Phelps-Roper

Daughter of Fred Phelps and also banned for homophobic views.



Artur Ryno

Former leader of violent Russian skinhead gang which committed 20 racially motivated murders. Currently in jail.



Pavel Skachevsky

Another former leader of violent Russian skinhead gang currently in jail. Gang beat migrants and posted videos of attacks on internet.



  • Abdullah Qadri Al Ahdal - an extremist preacher. Banned because he is considered to be engaging in unacceptable behaviour, including justifying or glorifying terrorist violence.
  • Mike Guzovsky - leader of a violent Jewish extremist group and actively involved with military training camps.
  • Safwat Hijazi - extremist preacher who makes television broadcasts. Considered to be glorifying terrorist violence.
  • Nasr Javed - senior Lashkar-e-Taiba operative, the group said to be behind the Mumbai attacks in November.
  • Amir Siddique - extremist preacher. Banned because his considered to be fomenting terrorist violence.
 

 Side Note by Dean A. Ayers, Director, AnimalsClubFreedom.org: 

I Demand an Apology for Michael Savage or Ban ME TOO in the UK!

 Until this outrageous propaganda promotion of Our US National Hero, Michael Savage being banned from the UK, I actually considered the UK a special friend. Now the government of the UK has PROVEN you are the enemy, promoting our USA National Hero, Michael Savage as a danger, by banning him from your country. You have OFFENDED me as an American, and I DEMAND to ALSO BE BANNED from the UK, to stand by MY HERO, Michael Savage. I will not rest or stop promoting the BOYCOTT of the UK until this fraud of a UK government apologizes in public to Michael Savage and all of America. http://AnimalsClubFreedom.org/


Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/


"United States Officially Certified Site"


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.


View Entry

Tuesday, May 5th 2009

11:53 PM (58 days, 15h, 27min ago)

Banned by U.K., Michael Savage hits back - Americans BOYCOTT the U.K.

  • Mood: All Americans need to BOYCOTT all products and services from the U.K. (ENGLAND).

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Banned by U.K., Michael Savage hits back - Americans BOYCOTT the U.K.

All Americans need to BOYCOTT all products and services from the U.K. (ENGLAND).


PUNISHING THOUGHT
Banned by U.K., Michael Savage hits back
Radio talk star blocked from visits, along with terrorists, neo-Nazis

Posted: May 05, 2009
8:26 am Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Talk radio host Michael Savage is considering legal action against Britain's top homeland security official after she released today a list grouping him with terrorists and neo-Nazi murderers banned from entry because the government believes their views might provoke violence.

In a telephone interview with WND, Savage said he is still waiting to hear back from attorneys, but he noted Britain has very strict anti-defamation laws.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she decided to publicize the list of 16 people banned since October to show the type of behavior Britain will not tolerate, according to U.K. news reports.

Don't be silent! Sign the petition to block government attacks on freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Savage's immediate reaction upon hearing the news was typically wry.

"Darn! And I was just planning a trip to England for their superior dental work and cuisine," he recalled thinking.

"Then it sank in," he told WND, "and I said, 'She said this is the kind of behavior we won't tolerate? She's linking me with mass murderers who are in prison for killing Jewish children on buses? For my speech? The country where the Magna Carta was created?'"

Smith explained to Britain's GMTV that she believed it was "important that people understand the sorts of values and sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it's a privilege to come and the sort of things that mean you won't be welcome in this country."

"Coming to this country is a privilege," she said. "If you can't live by the rules that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public those people that we have excluded."

Savage said he wants top First Amendment attorneys to represent him "in a major international case."

"I want to sue the British home secretary for defamation," he said, "for linking me up with murderers because of my opinions, my writings, my speaking – none of which have advocated any violence, ever."

Savage said the last time he was in Britain was about 20 years ago, and he had no immediate plans to return.

In an interview with the BBC, Smith said Savage, the No. 3-rated radio host in the U.S., is "someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred, of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person were allowed into the country."

Savage said his message for Smith and the people of the U.K. is, "Shame on you. Shame that you've fallen to such a low level."

"It's interesting to me that here I am a talk show host, who does not advocate violence, who advocates patriotic traditional values – borders, language, culture – who is now on a list banned in England," Savage said. "What does that say about the government of England? It says more about them than it says about me."

The U.K. list also includes Hamas leader Yunis Al-Astal, former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard Stephen Donald Black, neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe and radical American pastor Fred Phelps, known for his virulent anti-gay protests at funerals. Phelps' daughter Shirley Phelps-Roper also is on the list.

Smith said the British government believes the people on the list have views or attitudes that could provoke violence.

"If people have so clearly overstepped the mark in terms of the way not just that they are talking but the sort of attitudes that they are expressing to the extent that we think that this is likely to cause or have the potential to cause violence or inter-community tension in this country, then actually I think the right thing is not to let them into the country in the first place. Not to open the stable door then try to close it later," she said.

"It's a privilege to come to this country. There are certain behaviors that mean you forfeit that privilege."

The others on the list are Jewish nationalist Mike Guzovsky; imprisoned Russian skinhead leaders Artur Ryno and Pavel Skachevsky; and Islamic leaders Wadgy Abd El Hamied Mohamed Ghoneim, Abdullah Qadri Al Ahdal, Safwat Hijazi , Amir Siddique, Abdul Ali Musa, Samir Al Quntar and Nasr Javed.

Said Savage, "How can a nation put me on a list and leave hate preachers in England who say that we're going to kill all of you? We're going to convert all of you to Islam. How is it possible that those hate preachers can't be deported from Britain, but I can be banned from Britain? People who advocate actual murder cannot be deported from Britain.

"How is it that liberalism has gotten so distorted and cowardly?"

Note: Concerned individuals may contact Britain's Home Office Secretary Jacqui Smith by e-mail, call 011 44 20 7035 4848 or fax 011 44 20 7035 4745.

 
Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/


"United States Officially Certified Site"


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
 National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: 
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 
View Entry

Saturday, May 2nd 2009

6:02 AM (62 days, 9h, 18min ago)

H. J. Resolution 5; The USA does not need a dictator.



H. J. Resolution 5; The USA does not need a dictator.

 

H. J. Res. 5, proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

 

2 May 09

  

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com ©

 

 

BACKGROUND: New Amendment Proposals to the Constitution

 

The beginning of a new Congress always sees a lot of bills that would propose amendments to the Constitution. That idea always starts with at least one strike against it however that document is not to be trifled with.

 

Regarding the amending of the Constitution, Article V of the Constitution provides two ways for amendments to be proposed and approved: If both houses of Congress approve an amendment resolution by two-thirds votes, it is proposed, and then it has to be ratified (approved) by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states. The other way, which has never been used, is for the legislatures of two-thirds of the states to go into a convention at which constitutional amendments can be proposed. These also require ratification by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states.

 

 

PROBLEM ALERT: H. J. Resolution 5; The United States does not need a dictator.

 

This resolution is in the first step in the legislative process. Introduced bills and resolutions first go to committees that deliberate, investigate, and revise them before they go to general debate.

 

Source Link: http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=hj111-5

 

This amendment introduced on 1/6/2009 and called Amendment H. J. Resolution 5. It was introduced by Rep. José Serrano [D-NY] with no cosponsors.

 

 

 

FULL TEXT: The full text of the proposed amendment is as follows:

 

Text of H. J. Res. 5: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second...

 

This version: Introduced in House. This is the original text of the bill as it was written by its sponsor and submitted to the House for consideration. This is the latest version of the bill available on this website.

HJ 5 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 5

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 6, 2009

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

 

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

 

‘Article--

‘The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.’

 

 

The Long and Short of this Amendment Proposal:

 

Long story short, if this thing goes all the way, Obama (or anyone else, really), could keep being perpetually re-elected. I don't care who's in office; the 22nd Amendment serves a purpose and needs to stay. As Jefferson said (with apologies for my updated take), if that happens, POTUS could be for life, and would become an inheritance, not an elected position, which flies in the face of why we started this nation all those years ago. We elect a president, not a king or a dictator. And We the People do NOT want to see OBAMA or any other POTUS as king or dictator of the United States of America.

 

Rest assured this is very real, and very scary. The United States does not need a dictator.

 

Act now people, or forever be enslaved to a king and dictator with this proposed amendment moving forward as we speak. Please contact all members of your Local, State and Federal Legal and Congressional personnel now, to stop this nightmare in the making.

 

NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©

 

###

 

Copyright Note: Permission to cross post providing the entire article with all credits is left intact.

 

By Dean A. Ayers

Email: DogPressOrg@aol.com

"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director,
 Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

View Entry

Saturday, May 2nd 2009

3:01 AM (62 days, 12h, 19min ago)

Animal 'activist' control officers challenge your right in dog ownership

Animal 'activist' control officers challenge your right in dog ownership    Edit

Animal 'activist' control officers challenge your right in dog ownership 

 

Laws that limit the number of animals allowed in a household are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals

 

By Dean A. Ayers

Lead Investigative Reporter

NationalDogPress.com ©

 

2 May 09

 

 

Many dog owners in recent years have faced the unthinkable; a knock at their door that has heralded the arrival of an Animal Control officer with a complaint about your dog(s). In some cases that visit has been concluded satisfactorily to both the dog owner and the animal control officer; in others it has meant the heartache of either seizure of the owner’s dog(s) or facing stiff fines for various reasons in citation.

 

With animal ownership laws undergoing evolving changes throughout the country, these ‘perverted’ evolving animal control laws being used by both 'animal rights extremists' some of which are in fact, animal control officers, and others in animal rights groups as a means of dog owner 'harassment.' The possibility of a visit at your door on private property from Animal Control becomes ever more of a specter to haunt every dog owner.

 

Laws that limit the number of dogs, pets, and animals allowed in a household are intended to make it easier to prosecute individuals who are thought to have "too many," according to an arbitrary standard, but are also applied even to those people who are not in violation of health, nuisance and humane laws.

 

These dog or animal "number limit" laws are now being joined by various other anti-pet ownership restrictive laws, such as mandatory breeder permits for even a single one time litter of any dog and owner, dog or kennel licensing requirements for having more than 3 pets in the home and other vague animal control laws that can threaten responsible dog owners who are not in any kind of notable breeding business or whose dogs are well cared for and kept as extended family members confined to their homes, rather than caged outside alone and exposed to the climate, like a beast.

 

'Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom' National Organization is actively opposing all restrictive legislation limiting the responsible breeding and ownership of all dogs, cats, and other pets. Unfortunately some 'perverted' anti-pet ownership laws have still made their way onto the books. Just take a look at the 94 + page anti-pet ordinance of Louisville, KY by it's Metro counsel, or the tyranny animal control laws with a three strike violation rule, taking away any right to owning any pet or animal in Omaha, Nebraska.

 

For all dog owners, I remind you that it is important to promote the need for responsible freedom in the ownership of your dog(s) in order to prevent tyranny from overcoming common sense in dog ownership matters.

 

There is great value to society in the historic preservation of all our ownership of our chosen dog breeds as extended members of our family, and in the selective, planned breeding of our pets, for desirable and predictable traits in our chosen and favored dog breeds as well.

 

Claims that the organized dog fancy or local backyard hobby dog breeders contributes to the problem of homeless dogs in shelters cannot be supported by any alleged evidence from any Animal Rights activist groups, such as PETA, ELF, ALF, HSUS, or any local humane society through facts that are real, not manufactured like liberal propaganda.

 

Above all else, dog owners, backyard dog hobbyists and dog fanciers must all become aware of the animal control laws in their own locale, and must also be aware of their 'rights' if faced with that visit from an Animal Control Officer or Law Enforcement Officer regarding your pets and animals.

 

Above all it is necessary to be familiar with all animal identification regulations for your dogs in your locale, as the future to continued further 'restrictive' USDA regulations such as the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is potentially, only a 'stroke of the pen' away from being amended to include identification of many non-farm related pets and animals due to any potential future transmission of a communicable animal disease in dogs or other pets or animals that may arise.

 

At that time, you and your dogs, and animals will then have to deal with Federal, State, and local animal control regulations on your private property, called premises. Not only will you have a real possibility of 'animal control' showing up with restrictive regulations and ordinances of your dogs and your ownership freedom, but you will also have to deal with the 'dog-ma' of inspector police from the USDA or State controlled 'cow-cops' checking your animals on your private property premises as well.

 

ALWAYS, Always, always, educate yourself and learn your animal control laws for your area and 'stand your ground' in knowing your 'rights' in responsible dog ownership.

 

Remember when it comes to freely owning your dogs, pets and animals in an area frequented by Animal Rights Activists or Animal Control, "The truth is rarely pure and never simple."

 

© NationalDogPress.com Headline News 



View Entry

Thursday, April 30th 2009

1:27 AM (64 days, 13h, 54min ago)

Dear Mr. Obama, My Report Card on You as President

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Dear Mr. Obama, My Report Card on You as President





April 29, 2009 

The White House

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, DC



Dear Mr. Obama:


Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States. You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth..

I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?

Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States? This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?

Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia. You don't show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia. How dare you, sir! How dare you!

You can't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey. You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you?

I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you. You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.

What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members - on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't!

Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses.. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million - not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.

I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you. I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying our beautiful country.

And last, but certainly not least the exposition of details pertaining the Guantanamo and Abu Grab detainees. When Victoria Plame was 'outted' the Democrats went berserk and Scooter Libby went to jail. What are you thinking giving details of our military and intelligence operations to our enemies? Furthermore, what kind of advice were you listening too and what authorization did you have to shoot three pirates? Without the ACLU's permission? Who represented them? Silly, but that is how your position on the detainees being fairly treated sounds, and is ridiculous.


Sincerely,


Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/

"United States Officially Certified Site"

Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice: Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

View Entry

Tuesday, April 28th 2009

11:47 AM (66 days, 3h, 34min ago)

Obama plane fly over of ground zero panics New Yorkers

  • Mood: Shame on President Obama! No Concern for 9/11
NationalDogPress.com Headline News ©
 
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 08:33

Obama plane fly over of ground zero panics New Yorkers

 
The low-flying Obama aircraft caused panic in New York.

One of president Barack Obama's official planes flanked by an Air Force fighter jet flew low over the Statue of Liberty yesterday for a photo opportunity that reminded startled New Yorkers of the September 11th attacks.

The White House Military Office apologised for the mission, which infuriated New York City officials and prompted hundreds of financial professionals to flee their office buildings.

New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg criticized the federal government and his own administration for failing to warn the public, which was shocked by the image of a jumbo jet flanked by an F-16 flying near the World Trade Center site.

"The good news is it was nothing more than an inconsiderate, badly conceived and insensitive photo op with the taxpayers' money," Mr Bloomberg told reporters.

"They should know how sensitive people would be if they had low-flying planes down around the World Trade Center site," said Bloomberg, adding that he was "furious."

New Yorkers remain sensitive to any incident evocative of the 2001 attacks, which involved hijacked airliners that destroyed the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center.

The US Air Force said the "aerial photo mission" involved an F-16 fighter jet escort and one of the Boeing 747s designated as Air Force One when the president is aboard, which he was not. Police and the Federal Aviation Administration said three aircraft were approved for the mission.

Police said federal authorities told them not to disclose the information and to direct any inquiries to the FAA. Mr Bloomberg blamed a breakdown in City Hall communications, saying he would have protested had he known in advance.

Louis Caldera, director of the White House Military Office, said in a statement he approved the mission and took responsibility for the decision.

"While federal authorities took the proper steps to notify state and local authorities in New York and New Jersey, it's clear that the mission created confusion and disruption. I apologize and take responsibility for any distress that flight caused," Mr Caldera said.

Employees at the New York Mercantile Exchange, Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and other institutions evacuated their buildings, and hundreds of others called the 911 emergency response line, City councilman Daniel Garodnick wrote in a letter of complaint to the FAA.

"Thousands of people filled the streets in lower Manhattan, fearing the worst. If we had had advance warning, we could have advised our constituents not to be alarmed," \,t Garodnick said.

Dominick Caglioti, an independent commodities trader who works next to the site where the Twin Towers formerly stood, said, "We took it upon ourselves to leave the building. We asked police downstairs about it, and they said they didn't know anything. It could have caused some real panic."

President Obama, " failed to take full responsibility" for this lack of caring or any fore thought for 9/11 concerns, in low flying Air Force One over Ground Zero. Instead Obama passed the buck to the Air Force/FAA representative in charge of the fly over, holding them accountable for this panic in New York. This incident and lack of concern to notify New Yorkers and Americans of this low flying aircraft over Ground Zero is evidence that 9/11 or the American people are not even on Obama's mind in any respect.

 

 
Dean A. Ayers
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple."


http://AnimalsClubFreedom.us/


"United States Officially Certified Site"


Dean A. Ayers is a prior United States Air Force Special Agent for the AFOSI. His duties included that of law enforcement specialist, criminal, fraud, and counter-intelligence. He was assigned to felony crimes in federal government, fraud, waste and abuse investigations of the military branches of service, and counter-intelligence in overseas locations. Dean was also a former Texas State Commissioned Alamo State Park Armed Ranger.

Dean is currently Director, Animals C.L.U.B.- Freedom
National Organization and Dean is also a Lead Investigative Reporter for the NationalDogPress.com Headline News © and DogPress.org news press services.

Fair Use Notice:
Pursuant to Title 17 U.S.C. 107, other copyrighted work is provided for educational purposes, research, critical comment, or debate without profit or payment. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for your own purposes beyond the 'fair use' exception, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 
View Entry